These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26597452)

  • 1. An investigation into the optimal number of distractors in single-best answer exams.
    Kilgour JM; Tayyaba S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Aug; 21(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 26597452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.
    Sam AH; Westacott R; Gurnell M; Wilson R; Meeran K; Brown C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e032550. PubMed ID: 31558462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Student-written single-best answer questions predict performance in finals.
    Walsh J; Harris B; Tayyaba S; Harris D; Smith P
    Clin Teach; 2016 Oct; 13(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 26450346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.
    Fozzard N; Pearson A; du Toit E; Naug H; Wen W; Peak IR
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 30404624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment.
    Sam AH; Hameed S; Harris J; Meeran K
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):266. PubMed ID: 27737661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors.
    Raymond MR; Stevens C; Bucak SD
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 Mar; 24(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 30362027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
    Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving multiple-choice questions to better assess dental student knowledge: distractor utilization in oral and maxillofacial pathology course examinations.
    McMahan CA; Pinckard RN; Prihoda TJ; Hendricson WD; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Dec; 77(12):1593-609. PubMed ID: 24319131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple-Choice versus Open-Ended Questions in Advanced Clinical Neuroanatomy: Using a National Neuroanatomy Assessment to Investigate Variability in Performance Using Different Question Types.
    Merzougui WH; Myers MA; Hall S; Elmansouri A; Parker R; Robson AD; Kurn O; Parrott R; Geoghegan K; Harrison CH; Anbu D; Dean O; Border S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 May; 14(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 33420758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of long-menu and single-best-answer multiple choice questions in computer-based summative assessments: a randomised controlled trial.
    Cerutti B; Stollar F; Escher M; Blondon K; Aujesky S; Nendaz M; Galetto-Lacour A
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):219. PubMed ID: 31215430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
    Vyas R; Supe A
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?
    Hift RJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
    Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The introduction of single best answer questions as a test of knowledge in the final examination for the fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists in Clinical Oncology.
    Tan LT; McAleer JJ;
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Oct; 20(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 18585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Item statistics derived from three-option versions of multiple-choice questions are usually as robust as four- or five-option versions: implications for exam design.
    Loudon C; Macias-Muñoz A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Dec; 42(4):565-575. PubMed ID: 30192185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
    Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
    Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postexamination item analysis of undergraduate pediatric multiple-choice questions exam: implications for developing a validated question Bank.
    Rashwan NI; Aref SR; Nayel OA; Rizk MH
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 24(1):168. PubMed ID: 38383427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.