These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26597920)
1. The fate of triaged and rejected manuscripts. Zoccali C; Amodeo D; Argiles A; Arici M; D'arrigo G; Evenepoel P; Fliser D; Fox J; Gesualdo L; Jadoul M; Ketteler M; Malyszko J; Massy Z; Mayer G; Ortiz A; Sever M; Vanholder R; Vinck C; Wanner C; Więcek A Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Dec; 30(12):1947-50. PubMed ID: 26597920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition. Cejas C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fate of manuscripts rejected from the Red Journal. Holliday EB; Yang G; Jagsi R; Hoffman KE; Bennett KE; Grace C; Zietman AL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 25835616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology. Hall SA; Wilcox AJ Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. Chew FS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts. Enquselassie F Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts. Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fate of manuscripts previously rejected by the American Journal of Neuroradiology: a follow-up analysis. McDonald RJ; Cloft HJ; Kallmes DF AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 19001539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal. Ray J; Berkwits M; Davidoff F Am J Med; 2000 Aug; 109(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 10967154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An analysis of the fate of 917 manuscripts rejected from Clinical Otolaryngology. Earnshaw CH; Edwin C; Bhat J; Krishnan M; Mamais C; Somashekar S; Sunil A; Williams SP; Leong SC Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 42(3):709-714. PubMed ID: 28032954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection. Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication? Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fate of articles rejected by Indian Pediatrics. Dewan P; Gupta P; Shah D Indian Pediatr; 2010 Dec; 47(12):1031-5. PubMed ID: 21220799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts. Abby M; Massey MD; Galandiuk S; Polk HC JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 8015116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Farjo N; Turpin DL; Coley RY; Feng J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 26038071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls. Wyness T; McGhee CNj; Patel DV Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):864-7. PubMed ID: 20092595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012. Lamb CR; Adams CA Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? Rothwell PM; Martyn CN Brain; 2000 Sep; 123 ( Pt 9)():1964-9. PubMed ID: 10960059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]