BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26599926)

  • 1. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Vijayaraghavan GR; Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84. PubMed ID: 26599926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
    Korhonen KE; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(7):1954-1965. PubMed ID: 27715711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Maidment ADA; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):222-229. PubMed ID: 28463546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Johnson MM
    Radiol Technol; 2017 Jan; 88(3):299M-319M. PubMed ID: 28298592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Image acquisition principles and artifacts.
    Sujlana PS; Mahesh M; Vedantham S; Harvey SC; Mullen LA; Woods RW
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():188-195. PubMed ID: 30236642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging?
    Alakhras M; Bourne R; Rickard M; Ng KH; Pietrzyk M; Brennan PC
    Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):e225-36. PubMed ID: 23465326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.
    Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital breast tomosynthesis].
    Preibsch H; Siegmann-Luz KC
    Radiologe; 2015 Jan; 55(1):59-67; quiz 68-70. PubMed ID: 25609581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
    Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cancer risk estimation in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations and voxel phantoms.
    Ferreira P; Baptista M; Di Maria S; Vaz P
    Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 27133140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program.
    Zuckerman SP; Conant EF; Keller BM; Maidment AD; Barufaldi B; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES
    Radiology; 2016 Dec; 281(3):730-736. PubMed ID: 27467468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Baldwin P
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 81(1):57M-74M. PubMed ID: 19738189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.