176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26601731)
21. A review of technologies and performances of thermal treatment systems for energy recovery from waste.
Lombardi L; Carnevale E; Corti A
Waste Manag; 2015 Mar; 37():26-44. PubMed ID: 25535103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. When solid recovered fuel (SRF) production and consumption maximize environmental benefits? A life cycle assessment.
Ferronato N; Giaquinta C; Conti F; Torretta V
Waste Manag; 2024 Apr; 178():199-209. PubMed ID: 38402740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Potential of solid recovered fuel production from autoclave treated healthcare waste in Sultanate of Oman.
Al-Wahaibi M; Baird J
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2024 May; 74(5):304-318. PubMed ID: 38359400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of introducing energy recovery processes to the municipal solid waste management system in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Toshiki K; Giang PQ; Serrona KR; Sekikawa T; Yu JS; Choijil B; Kunikane S
J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Feb; 28():178-86. PubMed ID: 25662253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Short mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste allows landfill impact reduction saving waste energy content.
Scaglia B; Salati S; Di Gregorio A; Carrera A; Tambone F; Adani F
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 143():131-8. PubMed ID: 23792663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 1: SRF produced from commercial and industrial waste.
Nasrullah M; Vainikka P; Hannula J; Hurme M; Kärki J
Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1398-407. PubMed ID: 24735992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors influencing the life cycle burdens of the recovery of energy from residual municipal waste.
Burnley S; Coleman T; Peirce A
Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():295-304. PubMed ID: 25758908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of municipal solid waste treatment technologies from a life cycle perspective in China.
Dong J; Chi Y; Zou D; Fu C; Huang Q; Ni M
Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 24163375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The application of SRF vs. RDF classification and specifications to the material flows of two mechanical-biological treatment plants of Rome: Comparison and implications.
Di Lonardo MC; Franzese M; Costa G; Gavasci R; Lombardi F
Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):195-205. PubMed ID: 26243051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 2: SRF produced from construction and demolition waste.
Nasrullah M; Vainikka P; Hannula J; Hurme M; Kärki J
Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25074716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Greenhouse gas emissions of different waste treatment options for sector-specific commercial and industrial waste in Germany.
Helftewes M; Flamme S; Nelles M
Waste Manag Res; 2012 Apr; 30(4):421-31. PubMed ID: 22452957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Refuse derived fuel (RDF) plasma torch gasification as a feasible route to produce low environmental impact syngas for the cement industry.
López-Sabirón AM; Fleiger K; Schäfer S; Antoñanzas J; Irazustabarrena A; Aranda-Usón A; Ferreira GA
Waste Manag Res; 2015 Aug; 33(8):715-22. PubMed ID: 26081643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Elemental balance of SRF production process: solid recovered fuel produced from municipal solid waste.
Nasrullah M; Vainikka P; Hannula J; Hurme M; Oinas P
Waste Manag Res; 2016 Jan; 34(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26608898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Design, quality, and quality assurance of solid recovered fuels for the substitution of fossil feedstock in the cement industry.
Sarc R; Lorber KE; Pomberger R; Rogetzer M; Sipple EM
Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jul; 32(7):565-85. PubMed ID: 24942836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A review of energy recovery from waste in China.
Dorn T; Flamme S; Nelles M
Waste Manag Res; 2012 Apr; 30(4):432-41. PubMed ID: 22492261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sustainability of cement kiln co-processing of wastes in India: a pilot study.
Baidya R; Ghosh SK; Parlikar UV
Environ Technol; 2017 Jul; 38(13-14):1650-1659. PubMed ID: 28278774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Life Cycle Assessment of Mixed Municipal Solid Waste: Multi-input versus multi-output perspective.
Fiorentino G; Ripa M; Protano G; Hornsby C; Ulgiati S
Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():599-611. PubMed ID: 26257056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Life Cycle Assessment of mechanical biological pre-treatment of Municipal Solid Waste: a case study.
Beylot A; Vaxelaire S; Zdanevitch I; Auvinet N; Villeneuve J
Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():287-94. PubMed ID: 25708404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems for alternative legacy scenarios of the London Olympic Park.
Parkes O; Lettieri P; Bogle ID
Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():157-66. PubMed ID: 25837786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
