BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

726 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26602025)

  • 1. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes.
    Fanfani F; Restaino S; Gueli Alletti S; Fagotti A; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25982854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total Laparoscopic (S-LPS) versus TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy: A Case-Control Study.
    Fanfani F; Restaino S; Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Costantini B; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Perrone E; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 27247263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
    Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
    Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer.
    Fagotti A; Vizzielli G; Fanfani F; Gallotta V; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Gueli-Alletti S; Avenia N; Iodice R; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 24325899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
    Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
    Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Pelvic/Aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Endometrial Cancer Using Passive Instrument Positioners: A Retrospective Case-Control Series.
    Eisenkop SM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):800-809. PubMed ID: 29246636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
    Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technological innovation and personalized surgical treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer patients: A prospective multicenter Italian experience to evaluate the novel percutaneous approach.
    Gueli Alletti S; Cianci S; Perrone E; Fanfani F; Vascone C; Uccella S; Gallotta V; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Monterossi G; Scambia G; Rossitto C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():218-222. PubMed ID: 30731335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Adoption of Single-port Laparoscopy for Full Staging of Endometrial Cancer: Surgical and Oncology Outcomes and Evaluation of the Learning Curve.
    Barnes H; Harrison R; Huffman L; Medlin E; Spencer R; Al-Niaimi A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 28662990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes.
    Casarin J; Multinu F; Tortorella L; Cappuccio S; Weaver AL; Ghezzi F; Cilby W; Kumar A; Langstraat C; Glaser G; Mariani A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31780567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
    Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.
    Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer compared with laparotomy.
    Terai Y; Tanaka T; Sasaki H; Kawaguchi H; Fujiwara S; Yoo S; Tanaka Y; Tsunetoh S; Kanemura M; Ohmichi M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Feb; 40(2):570-5. PubMed ID: 24118459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.