These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26602200)

  • 1. Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test.
    Paiva GC; Fialho MB; Costa Dde S; Paula JJ
    Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2016 Jan; 74(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26602200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecological validity of executive function tests in moderate traumatic brain injury in Ghana.
    Adjorlolo S
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2016; 30(sup1):1517-1537. PubMed ID: 27071720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brazilian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ): cross-cultural adaptation and evidence of validity and reliability.
    de Paula JJ; Costa DS; Miranda DM; Romano-Silva MA
    Braz J Psychiatry; 2018; 40(3):312-315. PubMed ID: 29236920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-report instruments of cognitive failures as screening tools for Subjective Cognitive Impairment in older adults.
    Papaliagkas V; Papantoniou G; Tsolaki M; Moraitou D
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20 Suppl():58-70. PubMed ID: 29324915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective impairment after cardiac surgeries: the relevance of postoperative cognitive decline in daily living.
    Schwarz N; Kastaun S; Schoenburg M; Kaps M; Gerriets T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jun; 43(6):e162-6. PubMed ID: 23515168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of functional status in older adults: the ecological validity of four Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System tests.
    Mitchell M; Miller LS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Aug; 30(6):683-90. PubMed ID: 18608647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A real-life, ecologically valid test of executive functioning: the executive secretarial task.
    Lamberts KF; Evans JJ; Spikman JM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Jan; 32(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 19408184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of the Test of Everyday Attention among normal Hong Kong Chinese: a preliminary report.
    Chan RC; Hoosain R; Lee TM
    Clin Rehabil; 2002 Dec; 16(8):900-9. PubMed ID: 12501953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
    Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
    Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do traditional executive measures tell us anything about daily-life functioning after traumatic brain injury in Spanish-speaking individuals?
    García-Molina A; Tormos JM; Bernabeu M; Junqué C; Roig-Rovira T
    Brain Inj; 2012; 26(6):864-74. PubMed ID: 22583177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale: an interview-based assessment and its relationship to cognition, real-world functioning, and functional capacity.
    Keefe RS; Poe M; Walker TM; Kang JW; Harvey PD
    Am J Psychiatry; 2006 Mar; 163(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 16513863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the ecological validity of executive functioning assessment.
    Chaytor N; Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Burr R
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Apr; 21(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 16554143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity of two self-report measures of cognitive flexibility.
    Johnco C; Wuthrich VM; Rapee RM
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1381-1387. PubMed ID: 25265414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review of cognitive failures in daily life: Healthy populations.
    Carrigan N; Barkus E
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2016 Apr; 63():29-42. PubMed ID: 26835660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Everyday attention failures: an individual differences investigation.
    Unsworth N; McMillan BD; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1765-72. PubMed ID: 22468805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring slips and lapses when they occur - ambulatory assessment in application to cognitive failures.
    Lange S; Süß HM
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Feb; 24():1-11. PubMed ID: 24384496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ecological validity of the Multiple Errands Test using predictive models of dysexecutive problems in everyday life.
    Cuberos-Urbano G; Caracuel A; Vilar-López R; Valls-Serrano C; Bateman A; Verdejo-García A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2013; 35(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 23458357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the validity of self-report assessment of cognitive abilities: Attentional control scale associations with cognitive performance, emotional adjustment, and personality.
    Williams PG; Rau HK; Suchy Y; Thorgusen SR; Smith TW
    Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):519-530. PubMed ID: 27504900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive Complaints and Their Impact on Daily Life in Patients with Degenerative Cerebellar Disorders.
    Reumers SFI; Schutter DJLG; Maas RPPWM; de Leeuw FE; Kessels RPC; van de Warrenburg BPC
    Cerebellum; 2024 Jun; 23(3):1042-1052. PubMed ID: 37779173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do subjective measures of attention and memory predict actual performance? Metacognition in older couples.
    Volz-Sidiropoulou E; Gauggel S
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):440-50. PubMed ID: 21942900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.