These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Mechanical CPR. Leong SH Singapore Med J; 2011 Aug; 52(8):592-5. PubMed ID: 21879218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new standard dual-device method for CPR: the evolution of a new model of physiological synergy to improve patient care. Schultz J; Yannopoulos D Future Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 7(4):451-4. PubMed ID: 21797741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. HemoDynamic Duo. Improving survival from cardiac arrest using active compression-decompression CPR (ACD-CPR) with an ITD. Frascone RJ JEMS; 2014 Dec; Suppl():8-13. PubMed ID: 25630169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Window of opportunity: study examines benefits of new CPR approach for cardiac arrest. Page D JEMS; 2011 Sep; 36(9):34, 36. PubMed ID: 21925336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation: starting from basic science and bioengineering research to improve resuscitation outcome. Ristagno G; Pellis T; Li Y Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():737542. PubMed ID: 25610873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and active compression-decompression resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. French Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Study Group. Plaisance P; Lurie KG; Vicaut E; Adnet F; Petit JL; Epain D; Ecollan P; Gruat R; Cavagna P; Biens J; Payen D N Engl J Med; 1999 Aug; 341(8):569-75. PubMed ID: 10451462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The application of mechanical devices for CPR: make the first 5 minutes the best 5 minutes! O'Connor RE Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Sep; 56(3):242-3. PubMed ID: 20359772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved CPR. Increase effectiveness through quality improvement tools. Levy M JEMS; 2009 Sep; Suppl():suppl 18-21. PubMed ID: 19957703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of cardiac arrest: manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation vs. LifeBelt cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Youngquist ST; Niemann JT; Allread WG; Heyming T; Rosborough JP Prehosp Emerg Care; 2010; 14(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 20388031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Halperin H Crit Care Clin; 2012 Apr; 28(2):167-87. PubMed ID: 22433481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrests occurring in the hospital. Cohen TJ; Goldner BG; Maccaro PC; Ardito AP; Trazzera S; Cohen MB; Dibs SR N Engl J Med; 1993 Dec; 329(26):1918-21. PubMed ID: 8018138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated continuous chest compression for in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation of patients with pulseless electrical activity: a report of five cases. Bonnemeier H; Olivecrona G; Simonis G; Götberg M; Weitz G; Iblher P; Gerling I; Schunkert H Int J Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 136(2):e39-50. PubMed ID: 18691783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human studies may overestimate injuries related to mechanical chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Xanthos T; Pantazopoulos I; Papadimitriou L Resuscitation; 2010 Jun; 81(6):775; author reply 775-6. PubMed ID: 20223577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]