These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effect of valve design on the stent internal diameter of a bioprosthetic valve: a concept of true internal diameter and its implications for the valve-in-valve procedure. Bapat VN; Attia R; Thomas M JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Feb; 7(2):115-127. PubMed ID: 24440016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Transesophageal Echocardiographic In Vitro Measurements for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Implications for Percutaneous Valve-in-Valve Therapy. Condemi F; Bapat VN; Gianstefani S; Catibog N; Papachristidis A; Douiri A; Romeo F; Monaghan MJ J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Mar; 29(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 26711364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical valve evaluation with four-dimensional computed tomography. Numata S; Tsutsumi Y; Monta O; Yamazaki S; Seo H; Yoshida S; Samura T; Ohashi H J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Nov; 22(6):837-42. PubMed ID: 24597406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic Valve Annular Sizing: Intraoperative Assessment Versus Preoperative Multidetector Computed Tomography. George I; Guglielmetti LC; Bettinger N; Moss A; Wang C; Kheysin N; Hahn R; Kodali S; Leon M; Bapat V; Borger MA; Williams M; Smith C; Khalique OK Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28487320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: a proposed standard for valve size nomenclature. Christakis GT; Buth KJ; Goldman BS; Fremes SE; Rao V; Cohen G; Borger MA; Weisel RD Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 66(4):1198-203. PubMed ID: 9800806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of structural deterioration in an aortic bioprosthetic valve by multidetector row computed tomography: report of a case. Teshima H; Akasu K; Arinaga K; Aoyagi S; Tanaka H Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014; 20 Suppl():697-701. PubMed ID: 23411845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post-TAVI Follow-Up with MDCT of the Valve Prosthesis: Technical Application, Regular Findings and Typical Local Post-Interventional Complications. Soschynski M; Capilli F; Ruile P; Neumann FJ; Langer M; Krauss T Rofo; 2018 Jun; 190(6):521-530. PubMed ID: 29284171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis. McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position. Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement? Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of a transcatheter heart valve prosthesis with multidetector computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo imaging characteristics. de Heer LM; Habets J; Kluin J; Stella PR; Mali WP; van Herwerden LA; Budde RP Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 29(3):659-68. PubMed ID: 22875172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability, Agreement, and Presentation of a Reference Standard for Assessing Implanted Heart Valve Sizes by Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography. Suchá D; Daans CG; Symersky P; Planken RN; Mali WP; van Herwerden LA; Budde RP Am J Cardiol; 2015 Jul; 116(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 25935442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low radiation dose non-contrast cardiac CT: is it of value in the evaluation of mechanical aortic valve. Bazeed MF; Moselhy MS; Rezk AI; Al-Murayeh MA Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 22422269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed Tomography Annular Dimensions: A Novel Method to Compare Prosthetic Valve Hemodynamics. Deeb GM; Popma JJ; Chetcuti SJ; Yakubov SJ; Mumtaz M; Gleason TG; Williams MR; Gada H; Oh JK; Li S; Boulware MJ; Kappetein AP; Reardon MJ Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Nov; 110(5):1502-1510. PubMed ID: 32289296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. True external diameter better predicts hemodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic valves than the manufacturers' stated size. Cevasco M; Mick SL; Kwon M; Lee LS; Chen EP; Chen FY J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 May; 22(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 24151764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic aortic valves. Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes M; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jun; 27(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24534651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]