499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26602969)
1. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
Weksler B; Sullivan JL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-Term Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy: A Population-Based Study from Finland and Sweden.
Kauppila JH; Helminen O; Kytö V; Gunn J; Lagergren J; Sihvo E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):326-332. PubMed ID: 29094248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.
Watanabe M; Baba Y; Nagai Y; Baba H
Surg Today; 2013 Mar; 43(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 22926551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transition from open to minimally invasive en bloc esophagectomy can be achieved without compromising surgical quality.
Kammili A; Cools-Lartigue J; Mulder D; Feldman LS; Ferri LE; Mueller CL
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3067-3076. PubMed ID: 32556773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Achieving R0.
Darwish MB; Nagatomo K; Jackson T; Cho E; Osman H; Jeyarajah DR
JSLS; 2020; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 33414613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
