These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26603139)

  • 1. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of adaptable automation: Effects of extended skill lay-off and changes in system reliability.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():471-481. PubMed ID: 27633244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():333-42. PubMed ID: 26360226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operator adaptation to changes in system reliability under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Sauer J
    Ergonomics; 2017 Sep; 60(9):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 27875937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation.
    Bailey NR; Scerbo MW; Freeman FG; Mikulka PJ; Scott LA
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):693-709. PubMed ID: 17240718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experience of automation failures in training: effects on trust, automation bias, complacency and performance.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):767-80. PubMed ID: 26374396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.
    Muir BM; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 8849495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Displaying contextual information reduces the costs of imperfect decision automation in rapid retasking of ISR assets.
    Rovira E; Cross A; Leitch E; Bonaceto C
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1036-49. PubMed ID: 25277015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Role of Trust as a Mediator Between System Characteristics and Response Behaviors.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Proaps AB; Madhavan P
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):947-58. PubMed ID: 25917611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semi-automated CCTV surveillance: the effects of system confidence, system accuracy and task complexity on operator vigilance, reliance and workload.
    Dadashi N; Stedmon AW; Pridmore TP
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):730-8. PubMed ID: 22704458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing automation for complex work environments under different levels of stress.
    Sauer J; Nickel P; Wastell D
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 22726906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.
    Wright JL; Chen JYC; Barnes MJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29451105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems.
    Parasuraman R; Mouloua M; Molloy R
    Hum Factors; 1996 Dec; 38(4):665-79. PubMed ID: 11536753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influencing Trust for Human-Automation Collaborative Scheduling of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles.
    Clare AS; Cummings ML; Repenning NP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1208-18. PubMed ID: 26060238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces.
    Kunze A; Summerskill SJ; Marshall R; Filtness AJ
    Ergonomics; 2019 Mar; 62(3):345-360. PubMed ID: 30501566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting a Single Automation Failure: The Impact of Expected (But Not Experienced) Automation Reliability.
    Bowden VK; Griffiths N; Strickland L; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):533-545. PubMed ID: 34375538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.