These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26603769)

  • 1. Evaluation of Composite Adaptation to Pulpal Chamber Floor Using Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Scotti N; Alovisi C; Comba A; Ventura G; Pasqualini D; Grignolo F; Berutti E
    J Endod; 2016 Jan; 42(1):160-3. PubMed ID: 26603769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volumetric polymerization shrinkage and its comparison to internal adaptation in bulk fill and conventional composites: A μCT and OCT in vitro analysis.
    Sampaio CS; Fernández Arias J; Atria PJ; Cáceres E; Pardo Díaz C; Freitas AZ; Hirata R
    Dent Mater; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1568-1575. PubMed ID: 31500903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concurrent evaluation of composite internal adaptation and bond strength in a class-I cavity.
    Bakhsh TA; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Mandurah MM; Hariri I; Alsayed EZ; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23044389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
    Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites.
    Furness A; Tadros MY; Looney SW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24480086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cavity configuration on the adhesion of two resin-based composites to pulpal floor dentin.
    Akagawa H; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 16296428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
    Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
    Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of pressure changes on endodontically treated teeth during simulated dives.
    von See C; Rücker M; Koch A; Kokemueller H; Schumann P; Ziebolz D; Gellrich NC
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jan; 45(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 21899567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.
    Leevailoj C; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Moore BK; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Micro-shear bond strengths of adhesive resins to coronal dentin versus the floor of the pulp chamber.
    Toba S; Veerapravati W; Shimada Y; Nikaido T; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():51A-56A. PubMed ID: 14674500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal analysis of resin composite restorative systems using optical coherence tomography.
    Monteiro GQ; Montes MA; Gomes AS; Mota CC; Campello SL; Freitas AZ
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):e213-23. PubMed ID: 21925721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.