124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26603773)
1. Measuring radiotherapy setup errors at multiple neck levels in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC): A case for differential PTV expansion.
Cheo T; Loh Y; Chen D; Lee KM; Tham I
Radiother Oncol; 2015 Dec; 117(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 26603773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Need for Daily Image Guidance in Head and Neck Cancers Treated with Helical Tomotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis of a Large Number of Daily Imaging-based Corrections.
Saha A; Mallick I; Das P; Shrimali RK; Achari R; Chatterjee S
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Mar; 28(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 26746002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of setup error based on CTVision for nasopharyngeal carcinoma during IGRT.
Zhang S; Zhou X; Zhang Q; Jiang S; Wang R; Zhang G; Lei H; Lin S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):15-24. PubMed ID: 27455481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of inter-fraction and intra-fraction errors during volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Yin WJ; Sun Y; Chi F; Fang JL; Guo R; Yu XL; Mao YP; Qi ZY; Guo Y; Liu MZ; Ma J
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Apr; 8():78. PubMed ID: 23547760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of which local set-up errors can be covered by a 5-mm margin for cone beam CT-guided radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Zhong R; Song Y; Yan Y; Wang X; Li S; Zhou J; Li X; Bai S
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1088):20160849. PubMed ID: 29688742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study to assess and quantify the setup errors with cone-beam computed tomography in head-and-neck cancer image-guided radiotherapy treatment.
Jain V; Soni TP; Singh DK; Patni N; Jakhotia N; Gupta AK; Gupta TC; Singhal H
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(3):783-787. PubMed ID: 37470611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computer tomography-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer.
Wang J; Bai S; Chen N; Xu F; Jiang X; Li Y; Xu Q; Shen Y; Zhang H; Gong Y; Zhong R; Jiang Q
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Feb; 90(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 18930327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superiority of a soft tissue-based setup using cone-beam computed tomography over a bony structure-based setup in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Sato H; Abe E; Utsunomiya S; Kaidu M; Yamana N; Tanaka K; Ohta A; Obinata M; Liu J; Kawaguchi G; Maruyama K; Ayukawa F; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):239–245. PubMed ID: 26699304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image-guided radiotherapy protocols.
Abubakar A; Zamri NAM; Shaukat SI; Mohd Zin H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):137-146. PubMed ID: 34109736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical feasibility and performance of an orthogonal X-ray imaging system for image-guided radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer patients: Comparison with cone-beam CT.
Zhao LR; Zhou YB; Li GH; Li QM; Yang DQ; Li HX; Wan JQ; Sun JG
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):266-71. PubMed ID: 26703446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy.
Lee J; Liu SH; Lin JB; Wu MH; Wu CJ; Tai HC; Hsu SM; Chen YJ; Tai JC; Chen YJ
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):254. PubMed ID: 30587208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?
Houghton F; Benson RJ; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J; Gemmill J; Dean JC; Routsis DS; Jefferies SJ; Burnet NG
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):720-7. PubMed ID: 19740637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved setup and positioning accuracy using a three-point customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization system for stereotactic reirradiation of head and neck cancer.
Wang H; Wang C; Tung S; Dimmitt AW; Wong PF; Edson MA; Garden AS; Rosenthal DI; Fuller CD; Gunn GB; Takiar V; Wang XA; Luo D; Yang JN; Wong J; Phan J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):180-189. PubMed ID: 27167275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of local setup errors of sub-regions in cone-beam CT-guided post-mastectomy radiation therapy.
Zhou J; Li S; Ye C; Shen K; Li A; Chen G; Li X; Bai S; Wang W; Zhong R
J Radiat Res; 2020 May; 61(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 32100830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.
Mayyas E; Chetty IJ; Chetvertkov M; Wen N; Neicu T; Nurushev T; Ren L; Lu M; Stricker H; Pradhan D; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041707. PubMed ID: 23556877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of adequate setup margins and threshold for position errors requiring immediate attention in head and neck cancer radiotherapy based on 2D image guidance.
Kapanen M; Laaksomaa M; Tulijoki T; Peltola S; Wigren T; Hyödynmaa S; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Sep; 8():212. PubMed ID: 24020432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An image-guided study of setup reproducibility of postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated with inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Feng CH; Gerry E; Chmura SJ; Hasan Y; Al-Hallaq HA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 25442344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image guidance during head-and-neck cancer radiation therapy: analysis of alignment trends with in-room cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Zumsteg Z; DeMarco J; Lee SP; Steinberg ML; Lin CS; McBride W; Lin K; Wang PC; Kupelian P; Lee P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):712-9. PubMed ID: 22099037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy to the Mediastinum for Lymphoma Patients: Setup Uncertainties and Margins.
Aristophanous M; Chi PM; Kao J; Williamson R; Tung S; Andraos T; Milgrom SA; Pinnix CC; Dabaja BS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jan; 100(1):254-262. PubMed ID: 29100788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of interfraction patient setup for head-and-neck cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy using multiple computed tomography-based image guidance.
Qi XS; Hu AY; Lee SP; Lee P; DeMarco J; Li XA; Steinberg ML; Kupelian P; Low D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jul; 86(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 23474111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
