BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

743 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26604066)

  • 21. Hysteroscopic Resection of Endometrial Polyps and Assisted Reproductive Technology Pregnancy Outcomes Compared with No Treatment: A Systematic Review.
    Zhang H; He X; Tian W; Song X; Zhang H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 30557636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 24842672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles.
    Lin MH; Wu FS; Lee RK; Li SH; Lin SY; Hwu YM
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1296-302. PubMed ID: 23993928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Emergency IVF for embryo freezing to preserve female fertility: a French multicentre cohort study.
    Courbiere B; Decanter C; Bringer-Deutsch S; Rives N; Mirallié S; Pech JC; De Ziegler D; Carré-Pigeon F; May-Panloup P; Sifer C; Amice V; Schweitzer T; Porcu-Buisson G; Poirot C;
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2381-8. PubMed ID: 23832792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is the modified natural in vitro fertilization cycle justified in patients with "genuine" poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
    Kedem A; Tsur A; Haas J; Yerushalmi GM; Hourvitz A; Machtinger R; Orvieto R
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jun; 101(6):1624-8. PubMed ID: 24680364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poor-responder women: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles.
    Barrenetxea G; Agirregoikoa JA; Jiménez MR; de Larruzea AL; Ganzabal T; Carbonero K
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):546-53. PubMed ID: 17531989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ovarian stimulation and emergency in vitro fertilization for fertility preservation in cancer patients.
    Michaan N; Ben-David G; Ben-Yosef D; Almog B; Many A; Pauzner D; Lessing JB; Amit A; Azem F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Apr; 149(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 20074845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma cystectomy versus idiopathic DOR: comparison of in vitro fertilization outcome.
    Roustan A; Perrin J; Debals-Gonthier M; Paulmyer-Lacroix O; Agostini A; Courbiere B
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Apr; 30(4):840-7. PubMed ID: 25740883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Women with advanced-stage endometriosis and previous surgery respond less well to gonadotropin stimulation, but have similar IVF implantation and delivery rates compared with women with tubal factor infertility.
    Matalliotakis IM; Cakmak H; Mahutte N; Fragouli Y; Arici A; Sakkas D
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1568-72. PubMed ID: 17349642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of diagnostic hysteroscopy before the first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle.
    Yu HT; Wang CJ; Lee CL; Huang HY; Chen CK; Wang HS
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1323-8. PubMed ID: 22791384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 450 IU versus 600 IU gonadotropin for controlled ovarian stimulation in poor responders: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lefebvre J; Antaki R; Kadoch IJ; Dean NL; Sylvestre C; Bissonnette F; Benoit J; Ménard S; Lapensée L
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1419-25. PubMed ID: 26361207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lag time from ovulation trigger to oocyte aspiration and oocyte maturity in assisted reproductive technology cycles: a retrospective study.
    Weiss A; Neril R; Geslevich J; Lavee M; Beck-Fruchter R; Golan J; Shalev E
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 24880653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimal waiting period for fresh embryo transfer after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a retrospective cohort study.
    Deng K; Song XH; Han XM; Kong WY; Liu W; Han T; Yan L
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Oct; 132(19):2333-2339. PubMed ID: 31567384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A "freeze-all" embryo strategy after in vitro maturation: a novel approach in women with polycystic ovary syndrome?
    Ortega-Hrepich C; Stoop D; Guzmán L; Van Landuyt L; Tournaye H; Smitz J; De Vos M
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):1002-7. PubMed ID: 23850301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
    Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study.
    Pérez-Medina T; Bajo-Arenas J; Salazar F; Redondo T; Sanfrutos L; Alvarez P; Engels V
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Jun; 20(6):1632-5. PubMed ID: 15760959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of chronic endometritis on reproductive outcome.
    Kasius JC; Fatemi HM; Bourgain C; Sie-Go DM; Eijkemans RJ; Fauser BC; Devroey P; Broekmans FJ
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Dec; 96(6):1451-6. PubMed ID: 22019126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing body mass index: analysis of 239,127 fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from the 2008-2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    Provost MP; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Steward RG; Eaton JL; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):663-669. PubMed ID: 26627120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age, independent from ovarian reserve status, is the main prognostic factor in natural cycle in vitro fertilization.
    González-Foruria I; Peñarrubia J; Borràs A; Manau D; Casals G; Peralta S; Creus M; Ferreri J; Vidal E; Carmona F; Balasch J; Fàbregues F
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):342-347.e2. PubMed ID: 27117376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Autologous endometrial coculture biopsy: is timing everything?
    Melnick AP; Murphy EM; Masbou AK; Sapra KJ; Rosenwaks Z; Spandorfer SD
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jul; 104(1):104-9.e1. PubMed ID: 25989976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.