These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26604575)

  • 41. Comparision of dental arch widths in different types of malocclusions.
    Basaran G; Hamamci N; Hamamci O
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e20-8. PubMed ID: 19641761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: Comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Koo YJ; Choi SH; Keum BT; Yu HS; Hwang CJ; Melsen B; Lee KJ
    Korean J Orthod; 2017 May; 47(3):167-175. PubMed ID: 28523243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses.
    Dause R; Cobourne M; McDonald F
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fluctuating Dental Arch Asymmetry in Different Malocclusion Groups.
    Škrinjarić A; Šlaj M; Šlaj M
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2018 Jun; 52(2):105-113. PubMed ID: 30034009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Changes of arch width in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions.
    Ghafari J; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Markowitz DL; Shofer FS; Laster LL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 7977190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in skeletal class II malocclusions].
    Wu J; Jiang J; Zou W; Xu T; Liu X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 24437297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [A comparative study of the transverse dimensions of the dental arches between Class I dental occlusion and Class II1 and Class II2 malocclusions].
    Halimi A; Azeroual MF; Abouqal R; Zaoui F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2011 Dec; 34(136):47-52. PubMed ID: 22457992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Arch widths in class II-2 adults compared to adults with class II-1 and normal occlusion.
    Huth J; Staley RN; Jacobs R; Bigelow H; Jakobsen J
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):837-44. PubMed ID: 17685768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical Implications of Preformed Archwire Selection on the Treatment of Angle Class I/II division 1 Malocclusions in Thais.
    Dacha K; Sawaengkit P; Chaiwat J; Tiensuwan M
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):ZC24-9. PubMed ID: 26155557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint and mandibular dimensions after early correction of the maxillary arch form in patients with Class II division 1 or division 2 malocclusion.
    Coskuner HG; Ciger S
    Korean J Orthod; 2015 May; 45(3):121-9. PubMed ID: 26023540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Longitudinal evaluation of dental arch asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion with 3-dimensional digital models.
    Veli I; Yuksel B; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 24880847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Three-dimensional evaluation of tooth movement in Class II malocclusions treated without extraction by orthodontic mini-implant anchorage.
    Ali D; Mohammed H; Koo SH; Kang KH; Kim SC
    Korean J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 46(5):280-9. PubMed ID: 27668191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Use of Interarch Width Ratio to measure Transverse Relationship: A New Method to measure and assess Interarch Discrepancy.
    Batwa W; Baeshen HA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 29807960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Comparative Analysis of Arch Widths in Class I and Class II Malocclusion: Extraction vs. Non-extraction Treatment.
    Hegde A; D L; M SA; Geevee A; Srikant RM
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57982. PubMed ID: 38738108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Association of maxillary and mandibular base lengths with dental crowding in different skeletal malocclusions.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(4):428-33. PubMed ID: 25672157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.