152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26605124)
1. Inclusion probability for DNA mixtures is a subjective one-sided match statistic unrelated to identification information.
Perlin MW
J Pathol Inform; 2015; 6():59. PubMed ID: 26605124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TrueAllele casework on Virginia DNA mixture evidence: computer and manual interpretation in 72 reported criminal cases.
Perlin MW; Dormer K; Hornyak J; Schiermeier-Wood L; Greenspoon S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92837. PubMed ID: 24667531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of random match probability calculations to mixed STR profiles.
Bille T; Bright JA; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):474-85. PubMed ID: 23425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion.
Bieber FR; Buckleton JS; Budowle B; Butler JM; Coble MD
BMC Genet; 2016 Aug; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 27580588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correcting forensic DNA errors.
Hampikian G
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():32-33. PubMed ID: 30947116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis.
Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Cheng K; Budowle B; Coble MD
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():172-179. PubMed ID: 30176439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved individual identification in DNA mixtures of unrelated or related contributors through massively parallel sequencing.
Liu Z; Wu E; Li R; Liu J; Zang Y; Cong B; Wu R; Xie B; Sun H
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jun; 72():103078. PubMed ID: 38889491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation.
Perlin MW; Legler MM; Spencer CE; Smith JL; Allan WP; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1430-47. PubMed ID: 21827458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Case report: Coincidental inclusion in a 17-locus Y-STR mixture, wrongful conviction and exoneration.
Hampikian G; Peri G; Lo SS; Chin MH; Liu KL
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():1-4. PubMed ID: 28806630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt.
Pearson JM; Law JR; Skene JAG; Beskind DH; Vidmar N; Ball DA; Malekpour A; Carter RM; Skene JHP
Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Nov; 2(11):856-866. PubMed ID: 30931399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the FBI's Native American STR database for random match probability calculations.
Ng J; Oldt RF; Kanthaswamy S
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 Jan; 30():52-55. PubMed ID: 29175583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ForeStatistics: A windows-based feature-rich software program for performing statistics in forensic DNA analysis, paternity and relationship testing.
Rasool N; Hussain W
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110142. PubMed ID: 31927396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GHEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mixture profiles of autosomal STRs (GHEP-MIX01, GHEP-MIX02 and GHEP-MIX03): results and evaluation.
Crespillo M; Barrio PA; Luque JA; Alves C; Aler M; Alessandrini F; Andrade L; Barretto RM; Bofarull A; Costa S; García MA; García O; Gaviria A; Gladys A; Gorostiza A; Hernández A; Piñero MH; Hombreiro L; Ibarra AA; Jiménez MJ; Luque GM; Madero P; Martínez-Jarreta B; Masciovecchio MV; Modesti NM; Moreno F; Pagano S; Pedrosa S; Plaza G; Prat E; Puente J; Rendo F; Ribeiro T; Sala A; Santamaría E; Saragoni VG; Whittle MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 May; 10():64-72. PubMed ID: 24603342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA in the Criminal Justice System: The DNA Success Story in Perspective.
Mapes AA; Kloosterman AD; de Poot CJ
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):851-6. PubMed ID: 25845542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NGS-based likelihood ratio for identifying contributors in two- and three-person DNA mixtures.
Chan Mun Wei J; Zhao Z; Li SC; Ng YK
Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Jun; 74():428-433. PubMed ID: 29625871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Forensic DNA Profiling: Autosomal Short Tandem Repeat as a Prominent Marker in Crime Investigation.
Nwawuba Stanley U; Mohammed Khadija A; Bukola AT; Omusi Precious I; Ayevbuomwan Davidson E
Malays J Med Sci; 2020 Jul; 27(4):22-35. PubMed ID: 32863743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validating TrueAllele
Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of DNA match probability in criminal case.
Lee JW; Lee HS; Park M; Hwang JJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Feb; 116(2-3):139-48. PubMed ID: 11182265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
