218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26605432)
1. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy.
Buderath P; Kimmig R
Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26605432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G
Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Zhou J; Xiong BH; Ma L; Cheng Y; Huang W; Zhao L
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25823530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Gynecological Cancer: Conventional Laparoscopy and/or Robot-Assisted Surgery.
Minig L; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Zanagnolo V
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Mar; 27(3):562-574. PubMed ID: 28187093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Conrad LB; Ramirez PT; Burke W; Naumann RW; Ring KL; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1121-7. PubMed ID: 25860841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes.
Luciano AA; Luciano DE; Gabbert J; Seshadri-Kreaden U
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 25753111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications: an update.
Bretschneider CE; Jallad K; Paraiso MFR
Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 28177208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Prodromidou A; Spartalis E; Tsourouflis G; Dimitroulis D; Nikiteas N
J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):679-686. PubMed ID: 31956926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New approach of learning curve for robotic-assisted gynecologic oncology surgery].
Yaribakht S; Guillemin F; Harter V; Malartic C; Marchal F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 May; 43(5):348-55. PubMed ID: 25813433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Essential Elements of a Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Simpson KM; Advincula AP
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2016 Sep; 43(3):479-93. PubMed ID: 27521880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [How I do... a minimally invasive laparoscopic total hysterectomy, with extracorporeal manual tissue extraction in 10 steps (with video)].
Gloaguen S; Belghiti J; Azaïs H; Gonthier C; Nikpayam M; Uzan C; Canlorbe G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Jun; 47(6):540-544. PubMed ID: 31009799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies.
Clair KH; Tewari KS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jun; 46(6):828-843. PubMed ID: 32410262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Cancers.
Zanagnolo V; Garbi A; Achilarre MT; Minig L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):379-396. PubMed ID: 28104497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Fachechi G; Corso S; Pirovano C; Trio C; Villa M; Turoli D; Youssef A
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27460843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
