146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2660571)
1. Only an attitude away: the potential of reproductive surrogacy.
Sandberg EC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jun; 160(6):1441-6. PubMed ID: 2660571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Creating brave new families with advanced reproductive technologies.
Braverman AM; English ME
NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992; 3(2):353-63. PubMed ID: 1596443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical and legal issues in human egg donation.
Robertson JA
Fertil Steril; 1989 Sep; 52(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 2673841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical considerations in contemporary reproductive technologies.
Francis GR; Nosek JA
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 1988 Jan; 1(3):37-48. PubMed ID: 3288752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers?
Bernat E; Straka U
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sister-sister in vitro fertilization surrogate pregnancy with donor sperm: the case for surrogate gestational pregnancy.
Leeton J; King C; Harman J
J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1988 Oct; 5(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 3230346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted conception.
Craft I
Med Leg J; 1992; 58(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 11659676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Gamete donation and anonymity.
Templeton A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Apr; 98(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 2031890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Alternative reproduction.
Andrews LB; Douglass L
South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):623-82. PubMed ID: 11645847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The technology, law, and ethics of in vitro fertilization, gamete donation, and surrogate motherhood.
Wasserman D; Wachbroit R
Clin Lab Med; 1992 Sep; 12(3):429-48. PubMed ID: 1521422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technologies and the theology of the family.
Rae SB; Core JH
Ethics Med; 1994; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 11652747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes towards gamete donation among couples undergoing in vitro fertilization.
Oskarsson T; Dimitry ES; Mills MS; Hunt J; Winston RM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Apr; 98(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 2031893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogacy: a Catholic perspective.
McCormick RA
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1617-25. PubMed ID: 11653383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Law for protection of embryos.
Germany
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Control and compensation: laws governing extracorporeal generative materials.
Andrews LB
J Med Philos; 1989 Oct; 14(5):541-60. PubMed ID: 2691614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whose child is it anyway?
Platt EF
Med Leg J; 1994; 62 ( Pt 4)():180-97. PubMed ID: 7845312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical issues in reproductive endocrinology and infertility.
Ryan KJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jun; 160(6):1415-7; discussion 1419-24. PubMed ID: 2660568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
Hofheimer A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [New technologies in reproduction (NTR)].
Terzian E
Riv Inferm; 1991; 10(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 1947687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
