162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26605806)
1. Preparing for Combat Readiness for the Fight: Physical Performance Profile of Female U.S. Marines.
Kelly KR; Jameson JT
J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Mar; 30(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 26605806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.
Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR
US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fight load index and body composition are most associated with combat fitness in female Marines.
Allison KF; Keenan KA; Lovalekar M; Mi Q; Beals K; Coleman LCLC; Nindl BC
J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Apr; 22(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 30448087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Greater ankle strength, anaerobic and aerobic capacity, and agility predict Ground Combat Military Occupational School graduation in female Marines.
Allison KF; Keenan KA; Wohleber MF; Perlsweig KA; Pletcher ER; Lovalekar M; Beals K; Coleman LC; Nindl BC
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S85-S90. PubMed ID: 28899656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concept for a Predeployment Assessment of Basic Military Fitness in the German Armed Forces.
Rohde U; Sievert A; Rüther T; Witzki A; Leyk D
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S211-5. PubMed ID: 26506190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.
Hydren JR; Borges AS; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1142-1164. PubMed ID: 28135227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decreased Percent Body Fat but Not Body Mass is Associated with Better Performance on Combat Fitness Test in Male and Female Marines.
Pletcher ER; Lovalekar M; Coleman LC; Beals K; Nindl BC; Allison KF
J Strength Cond Res; 2023 Apr; 37(4):887-893. PubMed ID: 36026495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Differences in Physical Fitness and Occupational Task Performance Between Trainees and Active Duty Soldiers.
Canino MC; Foulis SA; Zambraski EJ; Cohen BS; Redmond JE; Hauret KG; Frykman PN; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 29952870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Reliability of Simulations of Physically Demanding Tasks Performed by Combat Arms Soldiers.
Foulis SA; Redmond JE; Frykman PN; Warr BJ; Zambraski EJ; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Dec; 31(12):3245-3252. PubMed ID: 28368954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A descriptive study of the U.S. Marine Corps fitness tests (2000-2012).
Bartlett JL; Phillips J; Galarneau MR
Mil Med; 2015 May; 180(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 25939104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in combat task performance under increasing loads in active duty marines.
Jaworski RL; Jensen A; Niederberger B; Congalton R; Kelly KR
Mil Med; 2015 Mar; 180(3 Suppl):179-86. PubMed ID: 25747650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional physical training improves women's military occupational performance.
Nindl BC; Eagle SR; Frykman PN; Palmer C; Lammi E; Reynolds K; Allison K; Harman E
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S91-S97. PubMed ID: 28986086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the correlation of the U.S. Air Force Physical Fitness Test to combat-based fitness: a women-only study.
Mitchell T; White ED; Ritschel D
Mil Med; 2014 Jun; 179(6):653-8. PubMed ID: 24902133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Executive Summary From the National Strength and Conditioning Association's Second Blue Ribbon Panel on Military Physical Readiness: Military Physical Performance Testing.
Nindl BC; Alvar BA; R Dudley J; Favre MW; Martin GJ; Sharp MA; Warr BJ; Stephenson MD; Kraemer WJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S216-20. PubMed ID: 26506191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and application of a questionnaire to self-rate physical work demands for ground combat soldiers.
Larsson J; Dencker M; Olsson MC; Bremander A
Appl Ergon; 2020 Feb; 83():103002. PubMed ID: 31747636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lower-body muscular power predicts performance on urban combat simulation.
Sankari M; Vaara JP; Pihlainen K; Ojanen T; Kyröläinen H
Work; 2024; 77(4):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 38517830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical Training Strategies for Military Women's Performance Optimization in Combat-Centric Occupations.
Nindl BC
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S101-6. PubMed ID: 26506171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of cross-training on fitness and injury in women.
Grier T; Canham-Chervak M; Anderson MK; Bushman TT; Jones BH
US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():33-41. PubMed ID: 26101904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Military Body Composition Standards and Physical Performance: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.
Harty PS; Friedl KE; Nindl BC; Harry JR; Vellers HL; Tinsley GM
J Strength Cond Res; 2022 Dec; 36(12):3551-3561. PubMed ID: 34593729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
