These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2660581)

  • 1. State of the art of cochlear implants. The UCSF experience.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Am J Otol; 1989 Mar; 10(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 2660581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The University of California, San Francisco/Storz cochlear implant program.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda J
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):287-305. PubMed ID: 3520442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The UCSF/Storz cochlear implant: patient performance.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Am J Otol; 1987 May; 8(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 3307448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient performance over eighteen months with the Ineraid intracochlear implant.
    Gray RF; Quinn SJ; Court I; Vanat Z; Baguley DM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():275-7. PubMed ID: 7668667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota.
    Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary results with the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Sep; 102(9):1006-13. PubMed ID: 1518346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Farmer JC; Lawson DT; Weber BA; Wolford RD; Kenan PD; White MW; Merzenich MM; Schindler RA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1069-77. PubMed ID: 3172953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Martin LF; Clark GM; Brown AM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 3160295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The UCSF/Storz multichannel cochlear implant: patient results.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda JL; Jackler RK
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Jun; 96(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 3754921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clarion cochlear implant: phase I investigational results.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Haggerty HS
    Am J Otol; 1993 May; 14(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 8372924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical trials with a 22-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Dec; 95(12):1448-54. PubMed ID: 3906323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech tracking in the evaluation of a multichannel cochlear prosthesis.
    Jenkins H; Chmiel R; Jerger J
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Mar; 99(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 2918797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nucleus 22-channel cochlear mini-system implantations in Mandarin-speaking patients.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8694134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-implant evaluation of speech and hearing.
    Abel SM; Tse SM
    J Otolaryngol; 1987 Oct; 16(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 3682048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.