979 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26606116)
1. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Robot assisted laparoscopic staging of endometrial cancer--comparison with standard laparotomy].
Pilka R; Marek R; Táborská S; Dzvincuk P
Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Dec; 76(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 22312843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic paraaortic lymphadenectomy in oncogynecology. Double side docking of daVinci S system increases the success rates of high paraaortic lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer.
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Hambálek J; Maděrka M; Jančeková V; Kolářová V; Langová K; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 31213052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual docking robotic surgical staging for high risk endometrial cancer.
Loaec C; Bats AS; Ngo C; Cornou C; Rossi L; Bensaid C; Nos C; Lecuru F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():79-83. PubMed ID: 29679815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes.
Casarin J; Multinu F; Tortorella L; Cappuccio S; Weaver AL; Ghezzi F; Cilby W; Kumar A; Langstraat C; Glaser G; Mariani A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31780567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
Torng PL; Pan SP; Hwang JS; Shih HJ; Chen CL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 29241920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two minimally invasive approaches to endometrial cancer staging: a single-surgeon experience.
Frey MK; Lin JF; Stewart LE; Makaroun L; Panico VJ; Holcomb K
J Reprod Med; 2015; 60(3-4):127-34. PubMed ID: 25898475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic surgery in women with endometrial cancer: the learning curve.
Holub Z; Jabor A; Bartos P; Hendl J; Urbánek S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Apr; 107(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 12648868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective investigation of fluorescence imaging to detect sentinel lymph nodes at robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging.
Paley PJ; Veljovich DS; Press JZ; Isacson C; Pizer E; Shah C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):117.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26743505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
