329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26606120)
1. [Correlation of subjective and objective assessment of vaginal prolapse surgery - secondary analysis of randomized controlled study in patients with pelvic floor injury treated with vaginal mesh or with sacrospinous ligament fixation].
Švabík K; El Haddad R; Mašata J; Hubka P; Martan A
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):351-4. PubMed ID: 26606120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial.
Svabik K; Martan A; Masata J; El-Haddad R; Hubka P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24615948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of outcomes after vaginal reconstruction surgery between elderly and younger women.
Tan YL; Lo TS; Khanuengkitkong S; Krishna Dass A
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 53(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 25286789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anterior needle-guided mesh in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: apical fixation on sacrospinous ligaments.
Menahem N; Natalia S; Vladimir S; Jacob B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jan; 172():120-3. PubMed ID: 24210791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up.
Lo TS; Al-Kharabsheh AM; Tan YL; Pue LB; Hsieh WC; Uy-Patrimonio MC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 29241922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement.
Lo TS; Horng SG; Huang HJ; Lee SJ; Liang CC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Oct; 84(10):992-5. PubMed ID: 16167917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies.
Zhu Q; Shu H; Du G; Dai Z
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():40-43. PubMed ID: 29455045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (SIMS): surgical and functional outcomes at 1 year.
Lo TS; Tan YL; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Wu PY; Al-Kharabsheh A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25017520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Synthetic Graft Augmentation in Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Long-Term Objective and Subjective Outcomes.
Meyer I; McGwin G; Swain TA; Alvarez MD; Ellington DR; Richter HE
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):614-21. PubMed ID: 26922879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy.
Lo TS; Pue LB; Hung TH; Wu PY; Tan YL
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1099-107. PubMed ID: 25808989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial).
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; Alhafidh AH; Hakvoort RA; Vierhout ME; van Eijndhoven HW
BMC Womens Health; 2011 Feb; 11():4. PubMed ID: 21324143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function.
Okcu NT; Gürbüz T; Uysal G
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):101977. PubMed ID: 33166707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
