These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Single-layer or double-layer suturing of the uterine incision in cesarean section? The late prognosis]. Iankov M Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1999; 38(4):11-2. PubMed ID: 10726342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should loose fascial sutures be removed in the 1st postoperative week in patients with superficial wound dehiscence and intact fascia after caesarean section using a Pfannenstiel incision? Lurie S; Mamet Y J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 May; 25(4):355-6. PubMed ID: 16091317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the quality of uterine suture after cesarean section (experimental study)]. El'tsov-Strelkov VI; Goldina AIa; Iurina NA Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1975 Aug; (8):65-7. PubMed ID: 1106249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reconstruction of the uterine wall in cesarean section by a single-stage double-layer suture--our experience]. Popov I; Pandurski F Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1989; 28(3):31-3. PubMed ID: 2679188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: MacLean AB, MacLean SB. 2008. Suture materials and subsequent wound strength. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 28:561-562. Ismail S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 May; 29(4):364-5. PubMed ID: 19835518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Personal experience with uterine sutures in cesarean section over a 12-year-period]. Cerný F Cesk Gynekol; 1988 Jul; 53(6):412-5. PubMed ID: 3048712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial. Daykan Y; Sharon-Weiner M; Pasternak Y; Tzadikevitch-Geffen K; Markovitch O; Sukenik-Halevy R; Biron-Shental T Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):406.e1-406.e5. PubMed ID: 28153666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cesarean section, techniques and skin suture materials]. Croce P; Frigoli A; Perotti D; Di Mario M Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Dec; 59(6):595-9. PubMed ID: 18043573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of barbed and smooth sutures for ovine cesarean delivery. Greenberg JA; Walden S; Hammer CM; Grazul-Bilska AT; Vonnahme KA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 113(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 21457976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Double contrasting in the ultrasonic study of the area of the suture on the uterus following cesarean section]. Belousov MA; Mareeva LS; Serova OF; Lokshina LA; Ishchenko AI Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Nov; (11):36-9. PubMed ID: 1814225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Ramsey PS; White AM; Guinn DA; Lu GC; Ramin SM; Davies JK; Neely CL; Newby C; Fonseca L; Case AS; Kaslow RA; Kirby RS; Rouse DJ; Hauth JC Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):967-73. PubMed ID: 15863532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Does the suture material and technique have an effect on healing of the uterotomy in cesarean section?]. Sestanović Z; Mimica M; Vulić M; Roje D; Tomić S Lijec Vjesn; 2003; 125(9-10):245-51. PubMed ID: 15038214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Study of the different technics of repairing hysterotomy. (Experimental study on pregnant and non pregnant animals)]. Waniorek A J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1972 Mar; 1(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 4558861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]