These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26606523)

  • 1. Can the sum of pooled data from observational studies better evaluate outcome measures for therapies in coronary artery disease?
    Luthra S; Taggart DP
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2016; 14(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 26606523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Zhang Y; Dong Z; Fan J; Nie S; Wei Y
    Respir Res; 2018 Apr; 19(1):61. PubMed ID: 29636058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized controlled trials vs. observational studies: why not just live together?
    Faraoni D; Schaefer ST
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 27769172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies.
    Garcia S; Sandoval Y; Roukoz H; Adabag S; Canoniero M; Yannopoulos D; Brilakis ES
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1421-31. PubMed ID: 23747787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization.
    Hordijk-Trion M; Lenzen M; Wijns W; de Jaegere P; Simoons ML; Scholte op Reimer WJ; Bertrand ME; Mercado N; Boersma E;
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Mar; 27(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 16423872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Five-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with left main coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials and adjusted observational studies.
    Gargiulo G; Tamburino C; Capodanno D
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 195():79-81. PubMed ID: 26025863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical trials versus registries in coronary revascularization: which are more relevant?
    Mack MJ
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2007 Nov; 22(6):524-8. PubMed ID: 17921739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Morrison DA; Sacks J
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2003 Oct; 51(5):585-97. PubMed ID: 14551526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Left Main Disease: Pre- and Post-EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) and NOBLE (Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularization Study) Era.
    Park DW; Park SJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28607000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observational studies using propensity score analysis underestimated the effect sizes in critical care medicine.
    Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):932-9. PubMed ID: 24774469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Untapped Potential of Observational Research to Inform Clinical Decision Making: American Society of Clinical Oncology Research Statement.
    Visvanathan K; Levit LA; Raghavan D; Hudis CA; Wong S; Dueck A; Lyman GH
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jun; 35(16):1845-1854. PubMed ID: 28358653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of clopidogrel pretreatment with mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bellemain-Appaix A; O'Connor SA; Silvain J; Cucherat M; Beygui F; Barthélémy O; Collet JP; Jacq L; Bernasconi F; Montalescot G;
    JAMA; 2012 Dec; 308(23):2507-16. PubMed ID: 23287889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based medicine-When observational studies are better than randomized controlled trials.
    Bosdriesz JR; Stel VS; van Diepen M; Meuleman Y; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2020 Oct; 25(10):737-743. PubMed ID: 32542836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of left main coronary artery disease.
    Kappetein AP; Head SJ; Osnabrugge RL; van Mieghem NM
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014; 26(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 25527012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase.
    Ong AT; Serruys PW; Mohr FW; Morice MC; Kappetein AP; Holmes DR; Mack MJ; van den Brand M; Morel MA; van Es GA; Kleijne J; Koglin J; Russell ME
    Am Heart J; 2006 Jun; 151(6):1194-204. PubMed ID: 16781219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease?
    Mehta RH; Lopes RD; Ballotta A; Frigiola A; Sketch MH; Bossone E; Bates ER
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jan; 159(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 20102880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass surgery for treatment of left main coronary artery disease: is it time to change guidelines?
    Park SJ; Park DW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 2(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 20031694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the optimal revascularization technique for isolated disease of the left anterior descending artery: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention?
    Patel AJ; Yates MT; Soppa GK
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Jul; 19(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 24667582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.