These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26606529)

  • 1. Dose- and time-dependent benefits of iPad technology in an undergraduate human anatomy course.
    Raney MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 26606529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring anatomy and physiology using iPad applications.
    Chakraborty TR; Cooperstein DF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):336-345. PubMed ID: 29112797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
    Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Student performance in and perceptions of a high structure undergraduate human anatomy course.
    Shaffer JF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):516-528. PubMed ID: 26990231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ATLAS project: The effects of a constructionist digital laboratory project on undergraduate laboratory performance.
    Shoepe TC; Cavedon DK; Derian JM; Levy CS; Morales A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 24678042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptions of a mobile technology on learning strategies in the anatomy laboratory.
    Mayfield CH; Ohara PT; O'Sullivan PS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 22927203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
    Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mobile technology: Creation and use of an iBook to teach the anatomy of the brachial plexus.
    Stewart S; Choudhury B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 25351850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using collaborative two-stage examinations to address test anxiety in a large enrollment gateway course.
    Fournier KA; Couret J; Ramsay JB; Caulkins JL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):409-422. PubMed ID: 28135034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of study approaches and course design on academic success in the undergraduate anatomy laboratory.
    Eleazer CD; Scopa Kelso R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Sep; 11(5):496-509. PubMed ID: 29314722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissection and dissection-associated required experiences improve student performance in gross anatomy: Differences among quartiles.
    Pizzimenti MA; Pantazis N; Sandra A; Hoffmann DS; Lenoch S; Ferguson KJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 May; 9(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 26536279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance equivalency between computer-based and traditional pen-and-paper assessment: A case study in clinical anatomy.
    Guimarães B; Ribeiro J; Cruz B; Ferreira A; Alves H; Cruz-Correia R; Madeira MD; Ferreira MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28817229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What type of learner are your students? Preferred learning styles of undergraduate gross anatomy students according to the index of learning styles questionnaire.
    Quinn MM; Smith T; Kalmar EL; Burgoon JM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):358-365. PubMed ID: 29096042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load.
    Küçük S; Kapakin S; Göktaş Y
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):411-21. PubMed ID: 26950521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed methods student evaluation of an online systemic human anatomy course with laboratory.
    Attardi SM; Choi S; Barnett J; Rogers KA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 May; 9(3):272-85. PubMed ID: 26588051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of a rotational dissection system in gross anatomy.
    Marshak DW; Oakes J; Hsieh PH; Chuang AZ; Cleary LJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 25358463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of educational comics in learning anatomy among multiple student groups.
    Kim J; Chung MS; Jang HG; Chung BS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 27233080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical session assessments in human anatomy: Weightings and performance.
    McDonald AC; Chan SP; Schuijers JA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 26580309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of image-based and text-based active learning exercises on student examination performance in a musculoskeletal anatomy course.
    Gross MM; Wright MC; Anderson OS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):444-455. PubMed ID: 28170167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.