These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26606529)

  • 21. Association between learning style preferences and anatomy assessment outcomes in graduate-entry and undergraduate medical students.
    O'Mahony SM; Sbayeh A; Horgan M; O'Flynn S; O'Tuathaigh CM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 26845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
    Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of introduction of blended learning in gross anatomy on student outcomes.
    Green RA; Whitburn LY
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 26929149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
    Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Complementing anatomy education using three-dimensional anatomy mobile software applications on tablet computers.
    Lewis TL; Burnett B; Tunstall RG; Abrahams PH
    Clin Anat; 2014 Apr; 27(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 23661327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The iPad: tablet technology to support nursing and midwifery student learning: an evaluation in practice.
    Brown J; McCrorie P
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2015 Mar; 33(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 25636039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Practicing handoffs early: Applying a clinical framework in the anatomy laboratory.
    Lazarus MD; Dos Santos JA; Haidet PM; Whitcomb TL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):476-87. PubMed ID: 26849177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Undergraduate coursework in anatomy as a predictor of performance: comparison between students taking a medical gross anatomy course of average length and a course shortened by curriculum reform.
    Peterson CA; Tucker RP
    Clin Anat; 2005 Oct; 18(7):540-7. PubMed ID: 16015636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. VARK learning preferences and mobile anatomy software application use in pre-clinical chiropractic students.
    Meyer AJ; Stomski NJ; Innes SI; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 May; 9(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 26109371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of anatomical knowledge by practical examinations: The effect of question design on student performance.
    Sagoo MG; Smith CF; Gosden E
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 26840187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Anatomy drawing screencasts: enabling flexible learning for medical students.
    Pickering JD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 25091417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An eight-year study of online lecture use in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course.
    Nieder GL; Borges NJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(6):311-20. PubMed ID: 22674561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Medical student use of the iPad in the clerkship curriculum.
    Youm J; Wiechmann W
    Clin Teach; 2015 Dec; 12(6):378-83. PubMed ID: 26095639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course.
    Pizzimenti MA; Axelson RD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 24845421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Lecture-Based Learning vs Discussion-Based Learning in Undergraduate Medical Students.
    Zhao B; Potter DD
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 26572094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of High-Definition Audiovisual Technology in a Gross Anatomy Laboratory: Effect on Dental Students' Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction.
    Ahmad M; Sleiman NH; Thomas M; Kashani N; Ditmyer MM
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Feb; 80(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 26834129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
    Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Impact of Team-Based Learning (TBL) on Physician Assistant Students' Academic Performance in Gross Anatomy.
    Isbell JA; Makeeva V; Caruthers K; Brooks WS
    J Physician Assist Educ; 2016 Sep; 27(3):126-130. PubMed ID: 27705982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lecture recording system in anatomy: possible benefit to auditory learners.
    Bacro TR; Gebregziabher M; Ariail J
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(6):376-84. PubMed ID: 23508921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Who is repeating anatomy? Trends in an undergraduate anatomy course.
    Schutte AF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 26179910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.