These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26608907)
21. Re: Ghost writers in the sky. Michel MC J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):788; discussion 788. PubMed ID: 18555489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Letter to the editor--Professionalism: ethics and scholarship in forensic science. Passalacqua NV; Pilloud MA; Gruters GA J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):573-5. PubMed ID: 24602059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. World Map of Scientific Misconduct. Ataie-Ashtiani B Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1653-1656. PubMed ID: 28653166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ethics in forensic psychiatry publishing. Kapoor R; Young JL; Coleman JT; Norko MA; Griffith EE J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 21908749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cutting the cake! publication ethics in science. Andersson L; Svensson P Dent Traumatol; 2013 Jun; 29(3):171. PubMed ID: 23672629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Scientific misconduct and breach of publication ethics: one editor's experience. Daroff RB Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 17970250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Qi X; Deng H; Guo X Postgrad Med J; 2017 Aug; 93(1102):499-503. PubMed ID: 27663911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Writing for publication: avoiding common ethical pitfalls. Siedlecki SL; Montague M; Schultz J J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 18344788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Publishing ethics--about intermediating science understandably and reliably]. Riis P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Jul; 130(13):1359-61. PubMed ID: 20596120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The ball is in your (journal editor's) court: newer insights into the ethics & 'un'-ethics in publishing. Kalra G Asian J Psychiatr; 2013 Dec; 6(6):635. PubMed ID: 24309895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics. Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S J BUON; 2012; 17(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 22740224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science. Gasparyan AY; Nurmashev B; Udovik EE; Koroleva AM; Kitas GD J Korean Med Sci; 2017 May; 32(5):713-717. PubMed ID: 28378542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article. Baydik OD; Gasparyan AY J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1508-10. PubMed ID: 27550475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The price of scientific freedom. Murray CA; Das SR Nat Mater; 2003 Apr; 2(4):204-5. PubMed ID: 12690383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Publishing ethics in psychiatry. Walter G; Bloch S Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2001 Feb; 35(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11270453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]