115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26608961)
1. A Hierarchical Model for Accuracy and Choice on Standardized Tests.
Culpepper SA; Balamuta JJ
Psychometrika; 2015 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 26608961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.
Bürkner PC; Schulte N; Holling H
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):827-854. PubMed ID: 31488915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.
Rush BR; Rankin DC; White BJ
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):250. PubMed ID: 27681933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].
Mackinnon A; Mulligan R
Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15971638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forced-Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling.
Guenole N; Brown AA; Cooper AJ
Assessment; 2018 Jun; 25(4):513-526. PubMed ID: 27056730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Mixture IRTree Model for Performance Decline and Nonignorable Missing Data.
Huang HY
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1168-1195. PubMed ID: 33116331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling Item Revisit Behavior: The Hierarchical Speed-Accuracy-Revisits Model.
Bezirhan U; von Davier M; Grabovsky I
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):363-387. PubMed ID: 37929265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multidimensional Forced-Choice CAT With Dominance Items: An Empirical Comparison With Optimal Static Testing Under Different Desirability Matching.
Lin Y; Brown A; Williams P
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):322-350. PubMed ID: 36866068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the Information Obtainable from Comparative Judgments.
Bürkner PC
Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1439-1472. PubMed ID: 35133553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examining the impact of specific types of item-writing flaws on student performance and psychometric properties of the multiple choice question.
Pham H; Besanko J; Devitt P
MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():225. PubMed ID: 38089249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model.
Wang Q; Zheng Y; Liu K; Cai Y; Peng S; Tu D
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):600-614. PubMed ID: 36750522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
Lee H; Smith WZ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new item response theory model to adjust data allowing examinee choice.
Pena CS; Costa MA; Braga Oliveira RP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191600. PubMed ID: 29389996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.
Frick S; Brown A; Wetzel E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 34464217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Mixture Hierarchical Model for Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.
Man K; Harring JR
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Oct; 83(5):1059-1080. PubMed ID: 37663535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rarely selected distractors in high stakes medical multiple-choice examinations and their recognition by item authors: a simulation and survey.
Rogausch A; Hofer R; Krebs R
BMC Med Educ; 2010 Nov; 10():85. PubMed ID: 21106066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory.
Wu Q; Vanerum M; Agten A; Christiansen A; Vandenabeele F; Rigo JM; Janssen R
Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):518-543. PubMed ID: 33928520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Classification Model for Forced-Choice Items and Noncognitive Tests.
Huang HY
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Feb; 83(1):146-180. PubMed ID: 36601255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Lognormal Ipsative Model for Multidimensional Compositional Items.
Chen CW; Wang WC; Mok MMC; Scherer R
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():573252. PubMed ID: 34712161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
