These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26609074)

  • 1. The use of Bjork's indications of growth for evaluation of extremes of skeletal morphology.
    Davidovitch M; Eleftheriadi I; Kostaki A; Shpack N
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):555-562. PubMed ID: 26609074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants.
    Springate SD; Jones AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9517716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing lower incisor inclination change: a comparison of four cephalometric methods.
    Jabbal A; Cobourne M; Donaldson N; Bister D
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 25888531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic model of anterior open bite--a new way to predict skeletal type: a cross-sectional study.
    Urzal V; Braga AC; Ferreira AP
    Int Orthod; 2014 Sep; 12(3):358-70. PubMed ID: 25087172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of antegonial notch depth for growth prediction.
    Kolodziej RP; Southard TE; Southard KA; Casko JS; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 11997759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):41-9. PubMed ID: 27653263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between Björk's structural signs of mandibular growth rotation and skeletofacial morphology.
    von Bremen J; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 16097217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
    Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
    Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric analysis of craniofacial morphology and growth in unrepaired isolated cleft palate patients.
    Xu Y; Yang C; Schreuder WH; Shi J; Shi B; Zheng Q; Wang Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1853-60. PubMed ID: 25169446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Craniofacial growth in cleidocranial dysplasia--a roentgencephalometric study.
    Jensen BL; Kreiborg S
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1995; 15(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 7601912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dento-facial structural characteristics in Angle Class II malocclusion associated with abnormal facial divergency].
    Wu KM; Chen YJ; Cheng MC; Chang HF; Chen KC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S130-8. PubMed ID: 1358360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aspects of mandibular morphology, with specific reference to the antegonial notch and the curve of Spee.
    Salem OH; Al-Sehaibany F; Preston CB
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 12739688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in the location of the human mandibular foramen as a function of growth and vertical facial type.
    Epars JF; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Jul; 73(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 25330162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
    AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A longitudinal cephalometric study of transverse and vertical craniofacial growth.
    Snodell SF; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Nov; 104(5):471-83. PubMed ID: 8237899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue airway dimensions and craniocervical posture in subjects with different growth patterns.
    Ansar J; Maheshwari S; Verma SK; Singh RK; Agarwal DK; Bhattacharya P
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 25245417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The morphology of the mandibular antegonial notches and facial symmetry.
    Preston B; Al-Sehaibany F; Salem O
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 11874007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation: assessment of the Skieller, Björk, and Linde-Hansen method.
    Leslie LR; Southard TE; Southard KA; Casko JS; Jakobsen JR; Tolley EA; Hillis SL; Carolan C; Logue M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Dec; 114(6):659-67. PubMed ID: 9844205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.