These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26609404)

  • 21. Patchless Multi-Stage Transfer Learning for Improved Mammographic Breast Mass Classification.
    Ayana G; Park J; Choe SW
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Mar; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 35267587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using an Efficient CAD System Based on Multiple Classifiers.
    Ragab DA; Sharkas M; Attallah O
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2019 Oct; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 31717809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.
    Tan M; Aghaei F; Wang Y; Zheng B
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 27997380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An artificial intelligent algorithm for tumor detection in screening mammogram.
    Zheng L; Chan AK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Jul; 20(7):559-67. PubMed ID: 11465463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Hybridized ELM for Automatic Micro Calcification Detection in Mammogram Images Based on Multi-Scale Features.
    Melekoodappattu JG; Subbian PS
    J Med Syst; 2019 May; 43(7):183. PubMed ID: 31093789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model.
    Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):159. PubMed ID: 26745908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterization of Architectural Distortion in Mammograms Based on Texture Analysis Using Support Vector Machine Classifier with Clinical Evaluation.
    Kamra A; Jain VK; Singh S; Mittal S
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 26138756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. False Positive Reduction by an Annular Model as a Set of Few Features for Microcalcification Detection to Assist Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
    Hernández-Capistrán J; Martínez-Carballido JF; Rosas-Romero R
    J Med Syst; 2018 Jun; 42(8):134. PubMed ID: 29915992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast Cancer Detection in Mammogram Images Using K-Means++ Clustering Based on Cuckoo Search Optimization.
    Wisaeng K
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36553095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast Mass Detection in Digital Mammogram Based on Gestalt Psychology.
    Wang H; Feng J; Bu Q; Liu F; Zhang M; Ren Y; Lv Y
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():4015613. PubMed ID: 29854359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital mammogram spiculated mass detection and spicule segmentation using level sets.
    Ball JE; Bruce LM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4979-84. PubMed ID: 18003124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative analysis of breast cancer detection in mammograms and thermograms.
    Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Feb; 60(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 25720034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental investigation on breast tissue classification based on statistical feature extraction of mammograms.
    Sheshadri HS; Kandaswamy A
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Jan; 31(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 17070012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A new near-term breast cancer risk prediction scheme based on the quantitative analysis of ipsilateral view mammograms.
    Sun W; Tseng TB; Qian W; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Yu H; Zhou S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():29-38. PubMed ID: 29512502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Oct; 19(10):1032-43. PubMed ID: 11131493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated and effective content-based image retrieval for digital mammography.
    Singh VP; Srivastava S; Srivastava R
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 29480232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes.
    Georgiou H; Mavroforakis M; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 17714924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
    Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Independent component analysis and neural networks applied for classification of malignant, benign and normal tissue in digital mammography.
    Campos LF; Silva AC; Barros AK
    Methods Inf Med; 2007; 46(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 17347758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets.
    Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.