These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26609743)
1. A Bivariate Generalized Linear Item Response Theory Modeling Framework to the Analysis of Responses and Response Times. Molenaar D; Tuerlinckx F; van der Maas HL Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(1):56-74. PubMed ID: 26609743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A generalized linear factor model approach to the hierarchical framework for responses and response times. Molenaar D; Tuerlinckx F; van der Maas HL Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):197-219. PubMed ID: 25109494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling. Meijer RR; Baneke JJ Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):354-68. PubMed ID: 15355153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hidden Markov Item Response Theory Models for Responses and Response Times. Molenaar D; Oberski D; Vermunt J; De Boeck P Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):606-626. PubMed ID: 27712114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling effects of differential item functioning in polytomous items. Wang WC J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12023558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A heteroscedastic generalized linear model with a non-normal speed factor for responses and response times. Molenaar D; Bolsinova M Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):297-316. PubMed ID: 28474768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times. Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Formulating latent growth using an explanatory item response model approach. Wilson M; Zheng X; McGuire L J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 22677494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response Mixture Modeling: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Item Characteristics across Response Times. Molenaar D; de Boeck P Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):279-297. PubMed ID: 29392567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A modular approach for item response theory modeling with the R package flirt. Jeon M; Rijmen F Behav Res Methods; 2016 Jun; 48(2):742-55. PubMed ID: 26174711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 2): Applications and novel extensions. Henninger M; Meiser T Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):577-595. PubMed ID: 33017167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scale validation via quantifying item validity using the Dm index. Taras V; Kline T Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):535-46. PubMed ID: 21117480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 1): A model integration. Henninger M; Meiser T Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):560-576. PubMed ID: 33017166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Item diagnostics in multivariate discrete data. Maydeu-Olivares A; Liu Y Psychol Methods; 2015 Jun; 20(2):276-92. PubMed ID: 25867486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A graded response model for measuring person reliability. Ferrando PJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):641-62. PubMed ID: 19159504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses. Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring change for a multidimensional test using a generalized explanatory longitudinal item response model. Cho SJ; Athay M; Preacher KJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):353-81. PubMed ID: 23082893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linear Ballistic Accumulator Item Response Theory Model for Multidimensional Multiple-Alternative Forced-Choice Measurement of Personality. Bunji K; Okada K Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(4):658-678. PubMed ID: 33750245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Hobart J; Cano S Health Technol Assess; 2009 Feb; 13(12):iii, ix-x, 1-177. PubMed ID: 19216837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing. van Rijn PW; Ali US Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]