These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26609878)

  • 1. Detecting Misspecified Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Common Fit Indices: A Monte Carlo Study.
    Hsu HY; Kwok OM; Lin JH; Acosta S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(2):197-215. PubMed ID: 26609878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Intraclass Correlation on the Effectiveness of Level-Specific Fit Indices in Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling: A Monte Carlo Study.
    Hsu HY; Lin JH; Kwok OM; Acosta S; Willson V
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 77(1):5-31. PubMed ID: 29795901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating fit indices in a multilevel latent growth curve model: A Monte Carlo study.
    Hsu HY; Lin JJH; Skidmore ST; Kim M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):172-194. PubMed ID: 30536150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the Performance of Level-Specific Fit Evaluation in MCFA Models With Different Factor Structures Across Levels.
    Lee B; Sohn W
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Dec; 82(6):1153-1179. PubMed ID: 36325122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are fit indices really fit to estimate the number of factors with categorical variables? Some cautionary findings via Monte Carlo simulation.
    Garrido LE; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 26651983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the performance of level-specific fit indices in multilevel confirmatory factor analysis with dichotomous indicators: A Monte Carlo study.
    Lin JJH; Hsu HY
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4222-4259. PubMed ID: 36417171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):409-428. PubMed ID: 29869222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification.
    Rhemtulla M
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):348-368. PubMed ID: 26828780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):731-755. PubMed ID: 30477318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree.
    Lai K; Green SB
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):220-39. PubMed ID: 27014948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.
    Shi D; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):421-445. PubMed ID: 32425213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation.
    Curran PJ; Bollen KA; Paxton P; Kirby J; Chen F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Jan; 37(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 26824167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Poor Fit of Model Fit for Selecting Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Scale Evaluation.
    Montoya AK; Edwards MC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Jun; 81(3):413-440. PubMed ID: 33994558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. dynamic : An R Package for Deriving Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Factor Analysis.
    Wolf MG; McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):189-194. PubMed ID: 36787513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models.
    McNeish D; Wolf MG
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1157-1174. PubMed ID: 35585278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.
    Shi D; Lee T; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):310-334. PubMed ID: 30911195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Misspecification in Growth Curve Models.
    Wu W; West SG
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 May; 45(3):420-52. PubMed ID: 26760488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of error structure misspecification when testing measurement invariance and latent-factor mean difference using MIMIC and multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Joo SH; Kim ES
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2688-2699. PubMed ID: 30242617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating fit indices in a multilevel latent growth model with unbalanced design: a Monte Carlo study.
    Pan F; Liu Q
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1366850. PubMed ID: 38765833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Misspecification in Latent Change Score Models: Consequences for Parameter Estimation, Model Evaluation, and Predicting Change.
    Clark DA; Nuttall AK; Bowles RP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(2):172-189. PubMed ID: 29300105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.