BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610200)

  • 1. Toenails as an alternative source material for the extraction of DNA from decomposed human remains.
    Schlenker A; Grimble K; Azim A; Owen R; Hartman D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jan; 258():1-10. PubMed ID: 26610200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post mortem sampling of the bladder for the identification of victims of fire related deaths.
    Owen R; Bedford P; Leditschke J; Schlenker A; Hartman D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):14-20. PubMed ID: 24314496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nails as a primary sample type for molecular genetic identification of highly decomposed human remains.
    Inkret J; Podovšovnik E; Zupanc T; Pajnič IZ
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Sep; 134(5):1629-1638. PubMed ID: 32372234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic identification of decomposed cadavers using nails as DNA source.
    Allouche M; Hamdoum M; Mangin P; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Dec; 3(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 19083867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of methods for forensic DNA extraction: Chelex-100® and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit (manual and automated).
    Phillips K; McCallum N; Welch L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):282-5. PubMed ID: 21703957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction processes for DNA-based identification from putrefied bodies in forensic routine work.
    Uerlings S; Welter V; Madea B; Grabmüller M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110707. PubMed ID: 33548585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of DNA to the disaster victim identification (DVI) effort.
    Hartman D; Drummer O; Eckhoff C; Scheffer JW; Stringer P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):52-8. PubMed ID: 21106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of direct PCR for routine DNA profiling of non-decomposed deceased individuals.
    Reid KM; Heathfield LJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 Nov; 60(6):567-572. PubMed ID: 33077040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Highly efficient automated extraction of DNA from old and contemporary skeletal remains.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Debska M; Gornjak Pogorelc B; Vodopivec Mohorčič K; Balažic J; Zupanc T; Štefanič B; Geršak K
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():78-86. PubMed ID: 26615474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of hard tissues that are useful for DNA analysis in forensic autopsy.
    Kaneko Y; Ohira H; Tsuda Y; Yamada Y
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Nov; 17(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 26209550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collecting and analyzing DNA evidence from fingernails: a comparative study.
    Hebda LM; Doran AE; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Sep; 59(5):1343-50. PubMed ID: 24666154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovery of human DNA profiles from poached deer remains part 2: improved recovery protocol without the need for LCN analysis.
    Tobe SS; Bailey S; Govan J; Welch LA
    Sci Justice; 2013 Mar; 53(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 23380058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tissue preservation in extreme temperatures for rapid response to military deaths.
    Connell J; Chaseling J; Page M; Wright K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():86-94. PubMed ID: 29957444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of FTA cards to acquire DNA profiles from postmortem cases.
    Green H; Tillmar A; Pettersson G; Montelius K
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1651-1657. PubMed ID: 30747256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA extraction method from bones using Maxwell® 16.
    Karija Vlahović M; Kubat M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2012 Sep; 14(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 22626613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validation of forensic DNA extraction systems to utilize soil contaminated biological evidence.
    Kasu M; Shires K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Jul; 17(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 25690910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [DNA extraction from decomposed tissue by double-digest and magnetic beads methods].
    Yang D; Liu C; Liu H
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 27(6):441-3. PubMed ID: 22393595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of sample degradation and inhibition on field-based DNA identification of human remains.
    Dawnay N; Flamson R; Hall MJR; Steadman DW
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():46-53. PubMed ID: 30077890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence and persistence of foreign DNA beneath fingernails.
    Matte M; Williams L; Frappier R; Newman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 21680274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraction of DNA from decomposed human tissue. An evaluation of five extraction methods for short tandem repeat typing.
    Hoff-Olsen P; Mevåg B; Staalstrøm E; Hovde B; Egeland T; Olaisen B
    Forensic Sci Int; 1999 Nov; 105(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 10643651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.