These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610200)

  • 1. Toenails as an alternative source material for the extraction of DNA from decomposed human remains.
    Schlenker A; Grimble K; Azim A; Owen R; Hartman D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jan; 258():1-10. PubMed ID: 26610200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post mortem sampling of the bladder for the identification of victims of fire related deaths.
    Owen R; Bedford P; Leditschke J; Schlenker A; Hartman D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):14-20. PubMed ID: 24314496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nails as a primary sample type for molecular genetic identification of highly decomposed human remains.
    Inkret J; Podovšovnik E; Zupanc T; Pajnič IZ
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Sep; 134(5):1629-1638. PubMed ID: 32372234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic identification of decomposed cadavers using nails as DNA source.
    Allouche M; Hamdoum M; Mangin P; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Dec; 3(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 19083867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of methods for forensic DNA extraction: Chelex-100® and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit (manual and automated).
    Phillips K; McCallum N; Welch L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):282-5. PubMed ID: 21703957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction processes for DNA-based identification from putrefied bodies in forensic routine work.
    Uerlings S; Welter V; Madea B; Grabmüller M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110707. PubMed ID: 33548585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of DNA to the disaster victim identification (DVI) effort.
    Hartman D; Drummer O; Eckhoff C; Scheffer JW; Stringer P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):52-8. PubMed ID: 21106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of direct PCR for routine DNA profiling of non-decomposed deceased individuals.
    Reid KM; Heathfield LJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 Nov; 60(6):567-572. PubMed ID: 33077040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Highly efficient automated extraction of DNA from old and contemporary skeletal remains.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Debska M; Gornjak Pogorelc B; Vodopivec Mohorčič K; Balažic J; Zupanc T; Štefanič B; Geršak K
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():78-86. PubMed ID: 26615474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of hard tissues that are useful for DNA analysis in forensic autopsy.
    Kaneko Y; Ohira H; Tsuda Y; Yamada Y
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Nov; 17(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 26209550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collecting and analyzing DNA evidence from fingernails: a comparative study.
    Hebda LM; Doran AE; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Sep; 59(5):1343-50. PubMed ID: 24666154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovery of human DNA profiles from poached deer remains part 2: improved recovery protocol without the need for LCN analysis.
    Tobe SS; Bailey S; Govan J; Welch LA
    Sci Justice; 2013 Mar; 53(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 23380058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tissue preservation in extreme temperatures for rapid response to military deaths.
    Connell J; Chaseling J; Page M; Wright K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():86-94. PubMed ID: 29957444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of FTA cards to acquire DNA profiles from postmortem cases.
    Green H; Tillmar A; Pettersson G; Montelius K
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1651-1657. PubMed ID: 30747256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA extraction method from bones using Maxwell® 16.
    Karija Vlahović M; Kubat M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2012 Sep; 14(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 22626613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validation of forensic DNA extraction systems to utilize soil contaminated biological evidence.
    Kasu M; Shires K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Jul; 17(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 25690910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [DNA extraction from decomposed tissue by double-digest and magnetic beads methods].
    Yang D; Liu C; Liu H
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 27(6):441-3. PubMed ID: 22393595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of sample degradation and inhibition on field-based DNA identification of human remains.
    Dawnay N; Flamson R; Hall MJR; Steadman DW
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():46-53. PubMed ID: 30077890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence and persistence of foreign DNA beneath fingernails.
    Matte M; Williams L; Frappier R; Newman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 21680274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraction of DNA from decomposed human tissue. An evaluation of five extraction methods for short tandem repeat typing.
    Hoff-Olsen P; Mevåg B; Staalstrøm E; Hovde B; Egeland T; Olaisen B
    Forensic Sci Int; 1999 Nov; 105(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 10643651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.