These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610222)

  • 1. Benchmarks for Electronically Excited States: A Comparison of Noniterative and Iterative Triples Corrections in Linear Response Coupled Cluster Methods: CCSDR(3) versus CC3.
    Sauer SP; Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Thiel W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Mar; 5(3):555-64. PubMed ID: 26610222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3.
    Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Sauer SP; Thiel W
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Apr; 128(13):134110. PubMed ID: 18397056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benchmarking Coupled Cluster Methods on Valence Singlet Excited States.
    Kánnár D; Szalay PG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Sep; 10(9):3757-65. PubMed ID: 26588520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Reference Energies and Benchmarks.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Blondel A; Garniron Y; Caffarel M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Aug; 14(8):4360-4379. PubMed ID: 29966098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmarking coupled cluster methods on singlet excited states of nucleobases.
    Kánnár D; Szalay PG
    J Mol Model; 2014 Nov; 20(11):2503. PubMed ID: 25394400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Bicyclic Systems.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem A; 2021 Dec; 125(47):10174-10188. PubMed ID: 34792354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Medium Sized Molecules.
    Loos PF; Lipparini F; Boggio-Pasqua M; Scemama A; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1711-1741. PubMed ID: 31986042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the Key for Accurate Absorption and Emission Calculations, Energy or Geometry?
    Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Mar; 14(3):1534-1543. PubMed ID: 29365256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmarks for electronically excited states: time-dependent density functional theory and density functional theory based multireference configuration interaction.
    Silva-Junior MR; Schreiber M; Sauer SP; Thiel W
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Sep; 129(10):104103. PubMed ID: 19044904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations.
    Loos PF; Comin M; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3666-3686. PubMed ID: 33955742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Coupled Cluster Excitation Energies in Diffuse Basis Sets.
    Kánnár D; Tajti A; Szalay PG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):202-209. PubMed ID: 27959525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of n-Electron Valence State Perturbation Theory for Vertical Excitation Energies.
    Schapiro I; Sivalingam K; Neese F
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Aug; 9(8):3567-80. PubMed ID: 26584112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A mountaineering strategy to excited states: Accurate vertical transition energies and benchmarks for substituted benzenes.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Comput Chem; 2024 Aug; 45(21):1791-1805. PubMed ID: 38661240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemically Accurate 0-0 Energies with Not-so-Accurate Excited State Geometries.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2481-2491. PubMed ID: 30802404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmarking second order methods for the calculation of vertical electronic excitation energies: valence and Rydberg states in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
    Falden HH; Falster-Hansen KR; Bak KL; Rettrup S; Sauer SP
    J Phys Chem A; 2009 Oct; 113(43):11995-2012. PubMed ID: 19780572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coupled-cluster calculations of the lowest 0-0 bands of the electronic excitation spectrum of naphthalene.
    Fliegl H; Sundholm D
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Jun; 16(21):9859-65. PubMed ID: 24406689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-Comparisons between Experiment, TD-DFT, CC, and ADC for Transition Energies.
    Suellen C; Freitas RG; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4581-4590. PubMed ID: 31265781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmarks of electronically excited states: basis set effects on CASPT2 results.
    Silva-Junior MR; Schreiber M; Sauer SP; Thiel W
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Nov; 133(17):174318. PubMed ID: 21054043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coupled cluster methods including triple excitations for excited states of radicals.
    Smith CE; King RA; Crawford TD
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Feb; 122(5):54110. PubMed ID: 15740313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementation of the iterative triples model CC3 for excitation energies using pair natural orbitals and Laplace transformation techniques.
    Frank MS; Schmitz G; Hättig C
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Jul; 153(3):034109. PubMed ID: 32716174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.