BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610248)

  • 21. Handling missing values in the analysis of between-hospital differences in ordinal and dichotomous outcomes: a simulation study.
    van Linschoten RCA; Amini M; van Leeuwen N; Eijkenaar F; den Hartog SJ; Nederkoorn PJ; Hofmeijer J; Emmer BJ; Postma AA; van Zwam W; Roozenbeek B; Dippel D; Lingsma HF;
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2023 Dec; 32(12):742-749. PubMed ID: 37734955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiple imputation in the presence of non-normal data.
    Lee KJ; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(4):606-617. PubMed ID: 27862164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Missing data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are not missing at random: implications and potential impact on quality assessments.
    Hamilton BH; Ko CY; Richards K; Hall BL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Feb; 210(2):125-139.e2. PubMed ID: 20113932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An approximate marginal logistic distribution for the analysis of longitudinal ordinal data.
    Nooraee N; Abegaz F; Ormel J; Wit E; van den Heuvel ER
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):253-61. PubMed ID: 26458164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel designs: A comparison of different strategies.
    Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Grund S
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):141-165. PubMed ID: 27607544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A SAS macro for residual deviance of ordinal regression analysis.
    Wan JY; Wang W; Bromberg J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 Dec; 45(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 7736732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple imputation for missing data via sequential regression trees.
    Burgette LF; Reiter JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 172(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 20841346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Methods for significance testing of categorical covariates in logistic regression models after multiple imputation: power and applicability analysis.
    Eekhout I; van de Wiel MA; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):129. PubMed ID: 28830466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ipsative imputation for a 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale in community-dwelling elderly people.
    Imai H; Furukawa TA; Kasahara Y; Ishimoto Y; Kimura Y; Fukutomi E; Chen WL; Tanaka M; Sakamoto R; Wada T; Fujisawa M; Okumiya K; Matsubayashi K
    Psychogeriatrics; 2014 Sep; 14(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 25323959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A multiple imputation model for imputing missing physiologic data in the national trauma data bank.
    Moore L; Hanley JA; Turgeon AF; Lavoie A; Emond M
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 209(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 19854396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Addressing Item-Level Missing Data: A Comparison of Proration and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
    Mazza GL; Enders CK; Ruehlman LS
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):504-19. PubMed ID: 26610249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A fully conditional specification approach to multilevel imputation of categorical and continuous variables.
    Enders CK; Keller BT; Levy R
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):298-317. PubMed ID: 28557466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis on binary responses with ordered covariates and missing data.
    Taylor JM; Wang L; Li Z
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3443-58. PubMed ID: 17219376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods.
    Shrive FM; Stuart H; Quan H; Ghali WA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Dec; 6():57. PubMed ID: 17166270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiple imputation of multiple multi-item scales when a full imputation model is infeasible.
    Plumpton CO; Morris T; Hughes DA; White IR
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jan; 9():45. PubMed ID: 26809812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of multiple imputation strategies for handling missing data in multi-item scales: Guidance for longitudinal studies.
    Mainzer R; Apajee J; Nguyen CD; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(21):4660-4674. PubMed ID: 34102709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of methods of handling missing data in individual patient data meta-analyses: an empirical example on antibiotics in children with acute otitis media.
    Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(5):540-5. PubMed ID: 18184640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multiple imputation for missing data: fully conditional specification versus multivariate normal imputation.
    Lee KJ; Carlin JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 171(5):624-32. PubMed ID: 20106935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiple imputation in a longitudinal cohort study: a case study of sensitivity to imputation methods.
    Romaniuk H; Patton GC; Carlin JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 180(9):920-32. PubMed ID: 25301814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.