BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610249)

  • 1. Addressing Item-Level Missing Data: A Comparison of Proration and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
    Mazza GL; Enders CK; Ruehlman LS
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):504-19. PubMed ID: 26610249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining proration and full information maximum likelihood in handling missing data in Likert scale items: A hybrid approach.
    Wu W; Gu F; Fukui S
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Apr; 54(2):922-940. PubMed ID: 34357540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-stage maximum likelihood approach for item-level missing data in regression.
    Chen L; Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2306-2323. PubMed ID: 32333330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Latent Variable Interactions With Incomplete Indicators.
    Cham H; Reshetnyak E; Rosenfeld B; Breitbart W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(1):12-30. PubMed ID: 27834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missing data methods for dealing with missing items in quality of life questionnaires. A comparison by simulation of personal mean score, full information maximum likelihood, multiple imputation, and hot deck techniques applied to the SF-36 in the French 2003 decennial health survey.
    Peyre H; Leplège A; Coste J
    Qual Life Res; 2011 Mar; 20(2):287-300. PubMed ID: 20882358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Managing missing items in the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a simulation study.
    Gutenkunst SL; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 May; 22(1):145. PubMed ID: 35596136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Including auxiliary item information in longitudinal data analyses improved handling missing questionnaire outcome data.
    Eekhout I; Enders CK; Twisk JW; de Boer MR; de Vet HC; Heymans MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):637-45. PubMed ID: 25724894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Handling Missing Data With Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Techniques.
    Schminkey DL; von Oertzen T; Bullock L
    Res Nurs Health; 2016 Aug; 39(4):286-97. PubMed ID: 27176912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Missing data on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a comparison of 4 imputation techniques.
    Bono C; Ried LD; Kimberlin C; Vogel B
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Mar; 3(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 17350555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Missing Data Mechanisms and Homogeneity of Means and Variances-Covariances.
    Yuan KH; Jamshidian M; Kano Y
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):425-442. PubMed ID: 29532404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Imputation Strategies for Ordinal Missing Data on Likert Scale Variables.
    Wu W; Jia F; Enders C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):484-503. PubMed ID: 26610248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of methods to address item non-response when testing for differential item functioning in multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures.
    Ayilara OF; Sajobi TT; Barclay R; Bohm E; Jafari Jozani M; Lix LM
    Qual Life Res; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2837-2848. PubMed ID: 35389187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
    Chen Y; Li X; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):124-146. PubMed ID: 30456747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normal Theory Two-Stage ML Estimator When Data Are Missing at the Item Level.
    Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    J Educ Behav Stat; 2017 Aug; 42(4):405-431. PubMed ID: 29276371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Out of sight, not out of mind: strategies for handling missing data.
    Buhi ER; Goodson P; Neilands TB
    Am J Health Behav; 2008; 32(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 18021036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximizing the Usefulness of Data Obtained with Planned Missing Value Patterns: An Application of Maximum Likelihood Procedures.
    Graham JW; Hofer SM; MacKinnon DP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1996 Apr; 31(2):197-218. PubMed ID: 26801456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simple imputation methods versus direct likelihood analysis for missing item scores in multilevel educational data.
    Kadengye DT; Cools W; Ceulemans E; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):516-31. PubMed ID: 22002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A factored regression model for composite scores with item-level missing data.
    Alacam E; Enders CK; Du H; Keller BT
    Psychol Methods; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37227897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymptotic bias of normal-distribution-based maximum likelihood estimates of moderation effects with data missing at random.
    Zhang Q; Yuan KH; Wang L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):334-354. PubMed ID: 30474256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.