These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610250)

  • 61. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3078-94. PubMed ID: 17187347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Propensity score estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated may yield very different estimates.
    Pirracchio R; Carone M; Rigon MR; Caruana E; Mebazaa A; Chevret S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1938-1954. PubMed ID: 24201469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Propensity score model overfitting led to inflated variance of estimated odds ratios.
    Schuster T; Lowe WK; Platt RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():97-106. PubMed ID: 27498378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Observational Research Using Propensity Scores.
    Raghunathan K; Layton JB; Ohnuma T; Shaw AD
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2016 Nov; 23(6):367-372. PubMed ID: 28115080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A matching method for improving covariate balance in cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Sekhon JS; Grieve RD
    Health Econ; 2012 Jun; 21(6):695-714. PubMed ID: 21633989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effect of assay measurement error on parameter estimation in concentration-QTc interval modeling.
    Bonate PL
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 23606626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Potential Pitfalls of Reporting and Bias in Observational Studies With Propensity Score Analysis Assessing a Surgical Procedure: A Methodological Systematic Review.
    Lonjon G; Porcher R; Ergina P; Fouet M; Boutron I
    Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):901-909. PubMed ID: 27232253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects.
    Franklin JM; Rassen JA; Ackermann D; Bartels DB; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(10):1685-99. PubMed ID: 24323618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Greedy caliper propensity score matching can yield variable estimates of the treatment-outcome association-A simulation study.
    Komen JJ; Belitser SV; Wyss R; Schneeweiss S; Taams AC; Pajouheshnia R; Forslund T; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2021 Jul; 30(7):934-951. PubMed ID: 33733533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research.
    Harder VS; Stuart EA; Anthony JC
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):234-49. PubMed ID: 20822250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on survival or time-to-event outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2348-2367. PubMed ID: 29869566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Terminating observation within matched pairs of subjects in a matched cohort analysis: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Sutradhar R; Baxter NN; Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 26278725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Evaluating large-scale propensity score performance through real-world and synthetic data experiments.
    Tian Y; Schuemie MJ; Suchard MA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 47(6):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 29939268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in Observational Studies of Treatment Effect.
    Johnson SR; Tomlinson GA; Hawker GA; Granton JT; Feldman BM
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2018 May; 44(2):203-213. PubMed ID: 29622292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [A Monte-Carlo study for propensity score methods].
    Wang T; Yamaguchi T; Ohashi Y; Feng XS; Jiang QW
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 26(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 16185467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Nearest Neighbour Propensity Score Matching and Bootstrapping for Estimating Binary Patient Response in Oncology: A Monte Carlo Simulation.
    Geldof T; Popovic D; Van Damme N; Huys I; Van Dyck W
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):964. PubMed ID: 31969627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Assessing covariate balance when using the generalized propensity score with quantitative or continuous exposures.
    Austin PC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1365-1377. PubMed ID: 29415624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Propensity Score Methods in Rare Disease: A Demonstration Using Observational Data in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
    Almaghlouth I; Pullenayegum E; Gladman DD; Urowitz MB; Johnson SR
    J Rheumatol; 2021 Mar; 48(3):321-325. PubMed ID: 32611674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A review of the performance of different methods for propensity score matched subgroup analyses and a summary of their application in peer-reviewed research studies.
    Wang SV; He M; Jin Y; Wyss R; Shin H; Ma Y; Keeton S; Fireman B; Karami S; Major JM; Schneeweiss S; Gagne JJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1507-1512. PubMed ID: 28984001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.