These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610251)

  • 1. Correcting Too Much or Too Little? The Performance of Three Chi-Square Corrections.
    Foldnes N; Olsson UH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):533-43. PubMed ID: 26610251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling.
    Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 35014004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling.
    Ryu E
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1066-74. PubMed ID: 21671139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.
    Heene M; Hilbert S; Draxler C; Ziegler M; Bühner M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):319-36. PubMed ID: 21843002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EVALUATION OF A NEW MEAN SCALED AND MOMENT ADJUSTED TEST STATISTIC FOR SEM.
    Tong X; Bentler PM
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2013 Jan; 20(1):148-156. PubMed ID: 23418401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abstract: Evaluation of Test Statistics for Robust Structural Equation Modeling With Nonnormal Missing Data.
    Tong X; Zhang Z; Yuan KH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2011 Nov; 46(6):1016. PubMed ID: 26736130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirically Corrected Rescaled Statistics for SEM with Small N and Large p.
    Yuan KH; Yang M; Jiang G
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(6):673-698. PubMed ID: 28891682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation.
    Curran PJ; Bollen KA; Paxton P; Kirby J; Chen F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Jan; 37(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 26824167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating Equivalence Testing Methods for Measurement Invariance.
    Counsell A; Cribbie RA; Flora DB
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):312-328. PubMed ID: 31389729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of an adjusted chi-square statistic as applied to observational studies involving clustered binary data.
    Jung SH; Ahn C; Donner A
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2149-61. PubMed ID: 11439427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approximations to the distribution of a test statistic in covariance structure analysis: A comprehensive study.
    Wu H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):334-362. PubMed ID: 29086416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Type I error rates and power of several versions of scaled chi-square difference tests in investigations of measurement invariance.
    Brace JC; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):467-485. PubMed ID: 27893215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables.
    Yuan KH; Tian Y; Yanagihara H
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):379-405. PubMed ID: 24327067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Extended GFfit Statistic Defined on Orthogonal Components of Pearson's Chi-Square.
    Reiser M; Cagnone S; Zhu J
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):208-240. PubMed ID: 35661291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?
    Hu LT; Bentler PM; Kano Y
    Psychol Bull; 1992 Sep; 112(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 1454899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Smoothed Quantiles for
    Yuan KH; Gomer B; Marcoulides KM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):223-242. PubMed ID: 33400593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Third Moment Adjusted Test Statistic for Small Sample Factor Analysis.
    Lin J; Bentler PM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Jan; 47(3):448-462. PubMed ID: 23144511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics.
    Yuan KH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2005 Jan; 40(1):115-48. PubMed ID: 26822275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An accurate test for homogeneity of odds ratios based on Cochran's Q-statistic.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jun; 15():49. PubMed ID: 26054650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.