BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610349)

  • 61. Recalibration of auditory space following milliseconds of cross-modal discrepancy.
    Wozny DR; Shams L
    J Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 31(12):4607-12. PubMed ID: 21430160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Time-dependent neural processing of auditory feedback during voice pitch error detection.
    Behroozmand R; Liu H; Larson CR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1205-17. PubMed ID: 20146608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Rapid temporal recalibration occurs crossmodally without stimulus specificity but is absent unimodally.
    Harvey C; Van der Burg E; Alais D
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1585():120-30. PubMed ID: 25148705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effects of stimulus duration on audio-visual synchrony perception.
    Kuling IA; van Eijk RL; Juola JF; Kohlrausch A
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Sep; 221(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 22821079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Neural correlates of temporal recalibration to delayed auditory feedback of active and passive movements.
    Schmitter CV; Kufer K; Steinsträter O; Sommer J; Kircher T; Straube B
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Dec; 44(17):6227-6244. PubMed ID: 37818950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Transfer of learned perception of sensorimotor simultaneity.
    Pesavento MJ; Schlag J
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 174(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 16688417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Auditory and motor contributions to the timing of melodies under cognitive load.
    Maes PJ; Giacofci M; Leman M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1336-52. PubMed ID: 26098119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Sensation of agency and perception of temporal order.
    Timm J; Schönwiesner M; SanMiguel I; Schröger E
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jan; 23():42-52. PubMed ID: 24362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension. 2. Evidence from sensorimotor synchronization.
    Aschersleben G; Bertelson P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Oct; 50(1-2):157-63. PubMed ID: 14511843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The influence of pacer-movement continuity and pattern matching on auditory-motor synchronisation.
    Zelic G; Nijhuis P; Charaf SA; Keller PE; Davis C; Kim J; Varlet M
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2705-2713. PubMed ID: 31420687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Actively but not passively synchronized motor activity amplifies predictive timing.
    Conradi N; Abel C; Frisch S; Kell CA; Kaiser J; Schmidt-Kassow M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():211-217. PubMed ID: 27329809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Temporal recalibration to tactile-visual asynchronous stimuli.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 430(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 18055112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain.
    Diaconescu AO; Alain C; McIntosh AR
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 106(6):2896-909. PubMed ID: 21880944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity.
    Fujisaki W; Shimojo S; Kashino M; Nishida S
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Jul; 7(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 15195098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Temporal judgments of immediate and delayed consequences of self-initiated movements.
    Glazebrook CM; Gonzalez C; Lyons J; Elliott D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20565175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.
    Schaeffner S; Koch I; Philipp AM
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 25813198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Attentional demands modulate sensorimotor learning induced by persistent exposure to changes in auditory feedback.
    Scheerer NE; Tumber AK; Jones JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 115(2):826-32. PubMed ID: 26655821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Processing expectancy violations during music performance and perception: an ERP study.
    Maidhof C; Vavatzanidis N; Prinz W; Rieger M; Koelsch S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2401-13. PubMed ID: 19702473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Temporal constraints in the use of auditory action effects for motor optimization.
    Neszmélyi B; Horváth J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1815-1829. PubMed ID: 30091635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.