301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610687)
1. Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.
Vass C; Gray E; Payne K
Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):620-30. PubMed ID: 26610687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review.
Vass CM; Georgsson S; Ulph F; Payne K
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 30991967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.
Naik-Panvelkar P; Armour C; Saini B
Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Feb; 21(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 23301529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.
Naik-Panvelkar P; Armour C; Rose JM; Saini B
Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Oct; 30(10):961-76. PubMed ID: 22823521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring trade-offs in nephrology: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments and conjoint analysis studies.
Clark MD; Szczepura A; Gumber A; Howard K; Moro D; Morton RL
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2018 Feb; 33(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 28158746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care.
Cheung KL; Wijnen BF; Hollin IL; Janssen EM; Bridges JF; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Dec; 34(12):1195-1209. PubMed ID: 27402349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient Preferences for Pharmacy Services: A Systematic Review of Studies Based on Discrete Choice Experiments.
Riboulet M; Clairet AL; Bennani M; Nerich V
Patient; 2024 Jan; 17(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 38093090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individual Preferences for Child and Adolescent Vaccine Attributes: A Systematic Review of the Stated Preference Literature.
Michaels-Igbokwe C; MacDonald S; Currie GR
Patient; 2017 Dec; 10(6):687-700. PubMed ID: 28474295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.
Williams G; Kinchin I
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):987-998. PubMed ID: 36169764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient preferences for healthcare delivery through community pharmacy settings in the USA: A discrete choice study.
Feehan M; Walsh M; Godin J; Sundwall D; Munger MA
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2017 Dec; 42(6):738-749. PubMed ID: 28627110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.
Kleij KS; Tangermann U; Amelung VE; Krauth C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jul; 17(1):476. PubMed ID: 28697796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient preferences for objective quality metrics during community pharmacy selection: A discrete choice experiment.
Patterson JA; Holdford DA; Harpe SE
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2019 Jun; 15(6):641-649. PubMed ID: 30143466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preferences for the delivery of community pharmacy services to help manage chronic conditions.
Whitty JA; Kendall E; Sav A; Kelly F; McMillan SS; King MA; Wheeler AJ
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2015; 11(2):197-215. PubMed ID: 25116938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer.
Vass CM; Wright S; Burton M; Payne K
Patient; 2018 Apr; 11(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 29032437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).
Larsen A; Tele A; Kumar M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 21(1):589. PubMed ID: 34144685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Vo LK; Allen MJ; Cunich M; Thillainadesan J; McPhail SM; Sharma P; Wallis S; McGowan K; Carter HE
Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jan; 340():116459. PubMed ID: 38048738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
