302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26610687)
21. Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.
Hall R; Medina-Lara A; Hamilton W; Spencer AE
Patient; 2022 May; 15(3):269-285. PubMed ID: 34671946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study.
Malhotra R; Suppiah SD; Tan YW; Sung P; Tay SSC; Tan NC; Koh GC; Chan A; Chew LST; Ozdemir S;
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2023 Nov; 19(11):1455-1464. PubMed ID: 37507340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Job preferences of undergraduate pharmacy students in China: a discrete choice experiment.
Liu P; Liu S; Gong T; Li Q; Chen G; Li S
Hum Resour Health; 2021 Jul; 19(1):79. PubMed ID: 34229701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review.
Mandeville KL; Lagarde M; Hanson K
BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Sep; 14():367. PubMed ID: 25179422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural Malawi.
Michaels-Igbokwe C; Lagarde M; Cairns J; Terris-Prestholt F
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Mar; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 24509049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.
Potoglou D; Burge P; Flynn T; Netten A; Malley J; Forder J; Brazier JE
Soc Sci Med; 2011 May; 72(10):1717-27. PubMed ID: 21530040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preference Elicitation Techniques Used in Valuing Children's Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A Systematic Review.
Bailey C; Howell M; Raghunandan R; Salisbury A; Chen G; Coast J; Craig JC; Devlin NJ; Huynh E; Lancsar E; Mulhern BJ; Norman R; Petrou S; Ratcliffe J; Street DJ; Howard K; Viney R;
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Jul; 40(7):663-698. PubMed ID: 35619044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.
Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A; Zweifel P; Johnson FR
Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):2. PubMed ID: 26743636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.
Vass C; Rigby D; Payne K
Med Decis Making; 2017 Apr; 37(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 28061040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice.
Mühlbacher A; Johnson FR
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 26992386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Methodology to derive preference for health screening programmes using discrete choice experiments: a scoping review.
Brain D; Jadambaa A; Kularatna S
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Aug; 22(1):1079. PubMed ID: 36002895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends.
Wang H; Rowen DL; Brazier JE; Jiang L
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2023 May; 21(3):405-418. PubMed ID: 36997744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.
Salloum RG; Shenkman EA; Louviere JJ; Chambers DA
Implement Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(1):140. PubMed ID: 29169397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.
Soekhai V; Donkers B; Johansson JV; Jimenez-Moreno C; Pinto CA; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob E
Patient; 2023 May; 16(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 36781628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Understanding Australian pharmacy degree holders' job preferences through the lens of motivation-hygiene theory.
Thai T; Lancsar E; Spinks J; Freeman C; Chen G
Soc Sci Med; 2024 May; 348():116832. PubMed ID: 38569288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences.
Ryan M; Bate A; Eastmond CJ; Ludbrook A
Qual Health Care; 2001 Sep; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i55-60. PubMed ID: 11533440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.
Harrison M; Rigby D; Vass C; Flynn T; Louviere J; Payne K
Patient; 2014; 7(2):151-70. PubMed ID: 24566923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.
Soekhai V; de Bekker-Grob EW; Ellis AR; Vass CM
Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Feb; 37(2):201-226. PubMed ID: 30392040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Are We Ready Yet?
Vass CM; Payne K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):859-866. PubMed ID: 28536955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.
Kaambwa B; Lancsar E; McCaffrey N; Chen G; Gill L; Cameron ID; Crotty M; Ratcliffe J
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Sep; 140():81-94. PubMed ID: 26210656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
