These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26611411)

  • 1. Image Pretreatment Tools II: Normalization Techniques for 2-DE and 2-D DIGE.
    Robotti E; Marengo E; Quasso F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1384():91-107. PubMed ID: 26611411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capabilities using 2-D DIGE in proteomics research : the new gold standard for 2-D gel electrophoresis.
    Rozanas CR; Loyland SM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 441():1-18. PubMed ID: 18370308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2D-DIGE: comparative proteomics of cellular signalling pathways.
    Larbi NB; Jefferies C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 517():105-32. PubMed ID: 19378013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data variance and statistical significance in 2D-gel electrophoresis and DIGE experiments: comparison of the effects of normalization methods.
    Keeping AJ; Collins RA
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Mar; 10(3):1353-60. PubMed ID: 21171621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative proteomics for two-dimensional gels using difference gel electrophoresis.
    Friedman DB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 367():219-39. PubMed ID: 17185779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving 2D-DIGE protein expression analysis by two-stage linear mixed models: assessing experimental effects in a melanoma cell study.
    Fernández EA; Girotti MR; López del Olmo JA; Llera AS; Podhajcer OL; Cantet RJ; Balzarini M
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(23):2706-12. PubMed ID: 18818217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternative experimental design with an applied normalization scheme can improve statistical power in 2D-DIGE experiments.
    Engelen K; Sifrim A; Van de Plas B; Laukens K; Arckens L; Marchal K
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Oct; 9(10):4919-26. PubMed ID: 20681517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard.
    Alban A; David SO; Bjorkesten L; Andersson C; Sloge E; Lewis S; Currie I
    Proteomics; 2003 Jan; 3(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 12548632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of proteins in human pancreatic cancer serum using differential gel electrophoresis and tandem mass spectrometry.
    Yu KH; Rustgi AK; Blair IA
    J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(5):1742-51. PubMed ID: 16212428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis image registration using block-matching techniques and deformation models.
    Rodriguez A; Fernandez-Lozano C; Dorado J; Rabuñal JR
    Anal Biochem; 2014 Jun; 454():53-9. PubMed ID: 24613260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical analysis of the experimental variation in the proteomic characterization of human plasma by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis.
    Corzett TH; Fodor IK; Choi MW; Walsworth VL; Chromy BA; Turteltaub KW; McCutchen-Maloney SL
    J Proteome Res; 2006 Oct; 5(10):2611-9. PubMed ID: 17022632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of difference in-gel electrophoresis for quantitation of protein expression.
    Sapra R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 492():93-112. PubMed ID: 19241028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of 2D-DIGE in cancer proteomics toward personalized medicine.
    Kondo T; Hirohashi S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 577():135-54. PubMed ID: 19718514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difference gel electrophoresis.
    Minden JS; Dowd SR; Meyer HE; Stühler K
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Jun; 30 Suppl 1():S156-61. PubMed ID: 19517495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing the difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) technology.
    Friedman DB; Lilley KS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 428():93-124. PubMed ID: 18287770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Use of Legendre and Zernike Moment Functions for the Comparison of 2-D PAGE Maps.
    Marengo E; Robotti E; Demartini M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1384():271-88. PubMed ID: 26611420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DIGE Analysis of Human Tissues.
    Gelfi C; Capitanio D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1664():117-136. PubMed ID: 29019130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The application of DIGE-based proteomics to renal physiology.
    Hoorn EJ; Hoffert JD; Knepper MA
    Nephron Physiol; 2006; 104(1):p61-72. PubMed ID: 16721037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of proteomics in cancer gene profiling: two-dimensional difference in gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE).
    Hariharan D; Weeks ME; Crnogorac-Jurcevic T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 576():197-211. PubMed ID: 19882264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decoding two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis complex maps by autocovariance function: a simplified approach useful for proteomics.
    Pietrogrande MC; Marchetti N; Tosi A; Dondi F; Righetti PG
    Electrophoresis; 2005 Jul; 26(14):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15966009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.