These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26611466)

  • 1. Validity and Reliability of GraphClick and DataThief III for Data Extraction.
    Flower A; McKenna JW; Upreti G
    Behav Modif; 2016 May; 40(3):396-413. PubMed ID: 26611466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability, Validity, and Usability of Data Extraction Programs for Single-Case Research Designs.
    Moeyaert M; Maggin D; Verkuilen J
    Behav Modif; 2016 Nov; 40(6):874-900. PubMed ID: 27126988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extracting data from figures with software was faster, with higher interrater reliability than manual extraction.
    Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Dosenovic S; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():119-23. PubMed ID: 26780258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for assessing the quality of data in public health information systems: a critical review.
    Chen H; Yu P; Hailey D; Wang N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 204():13-8. PubMed ID: 25087521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.
    Tate RL; McDonald S; Perdices M; Togher L; Schultz R; Savage S
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 18(4):385-401. PubMed ID: 18576270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions III: Synthesizing data from intervention studies using meta-analysis.
    O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Wang C
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():52-63. PubMed ID: 24905996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis method for discovering reliable biomarkers by integrating statistical and biological approaches: An application to liver toxicity.
    Cho H; Kim H; Na D; Kim SY; Jo D; Lee D
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Mar; 471(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 26820531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating intervention effects across different types of single-subject experimental designs: empirical illustration.
    Moeyaert M; Ugille M; Ferron JM; Onghena P; Heyvaert M; Beretvas SN; Van den Noortgate W
    Sch Psychol Q; 2015 Mar; 30(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 24884449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of the design matrix on treatment effect estimates in the quantitative analyses of single-subject experimental design research.
    Moeyaert M; Ugille M; Ferron JM; Beretvas SN; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Modif; 2014 Sep; 38(5):665-704. PubMed ID: 24902590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Between-case standardized effect size analysis of single case designs: Examination of the two methods.
    Odom SL; Barton EE; Reichow B; Swaminathan H; Pustejovsky JE
    Res Dev Disabil; 2018 Aug; 79():88-96. PubMed ID: 29807692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of single-case data: randomisation tests for measures of effect size.
    Heyvaert M; Onghena P
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2014; 24(3-4):507-27. PubMed ID: 23865938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta- and statistical analysis of single-case intervention research data: quantitative gifts and a wish list.
    Kratochwill TR; Levin JR
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24606977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals.
    Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE; Shadish WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):324-41. PubMed ID: 26053946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies.
    Bax L; Yu LM; Ikeda N; Moons KG
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Sep; 7():40. PubMed ID: 17845719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the quality of published genetic association studies in meta-analyses: the quality of genetic studies (Q-Genie) tool.
    Sohani ZN; Meyre D; de Souza RJ; Joseph PG; Gandhi M; Dennis BB; Norman G; Anand SS
    BMC Genet; 2015 May; 16():50. PubMed ID: 25975208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using UnGraph to extract data from image files: verification of reliability and validity.
    Shadish WR; Brasil ICC; Illingworth DA; White KD; Galindo R; Nagler ED; Rindskopf DM
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Feb; 41(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 19182138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability: resolving some critical issues for clinicians and researchers.
    Cicchetti D; Bronen R; Spencer S; Haut S; Berg A; Oliver P; Tyrer P
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Aug; 194(8):557-64. PubMed ID: 16909062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Customization of pain treatments: single-case design and analysis.
    Onghena P; Edgington ES
    Clin J Pain; 2005; 21(1):56-68; discussion 69-72. PubMed ID: 15599132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated?
    Colliver JA; Kucera K; Verhulst SJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Sep; 42(9):858-65. PubMed ID: 18715482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured Rater x Ratee designs.
    Hönekopp J; Becker BJ; Oswald FL
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 16594768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.