283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26611641)
1. A dose calculation algorithm with correction for proton-nucleus interactions in non-water materials for proton radiotherapy treatment planning.
Inaniwa T; Kanematsu N; Sato S; Kohno R
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(1):67-89. PubMed ID: 26611641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo calculated stopping-power ratios, water/air, for clinical proton dosimetry (50-250 MeV).
Medin J; Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jan; 42(1):89-105. PubMed ID: 9015811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-dimensional pencil beam scaling: an improved proton dose algorithm for heterogeneous media.
Szymanowski H; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(18):3313-30. PubMed ID: 12375823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity.
Bueno M; Paganetti H; Duch MA; Schuemann J
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081704. PubMed ID: 23927301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluence correction factors for graphite calorimetry in a low-energy clinical proton beam: I. Analytical and Monte Carlo simulations.
Palmans H; Al-Sulaiti L; Andreo P; Shipley D; Lühr A; Bassler N; Martinkovič J; Dobrovodský J; Rossomme S; Thomas RA; Kacperek A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 May; 58(10):3481-99. PubMed ID: 23629423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical characterization of therapeutic proton delivery through common dental materials.
Hu YH; Wan Chan Tseung HS; Mundy DW
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2904-2913. PubMed ID: 35276753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analytical dose modeling for preclinical proton irradiation of millimetric targets.
Vanstalle M; Constanzo J; Karakaya Y; Finck C; Rousseau M; Brasse D
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):470-478. PubMed ID: 29178161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive step size algorithm to increase efficiency of proton macro Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Kueng R; Frei D; Volken W; Stuermlin F; M Stampanoni MF; Aebersold DM; Manser P; Fix MK
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Sep; 14(1):165. PubMed ID: 31500647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calculation of water equivalent ratios for various materials at proton energies ranging 10-500 MeV using MCNP, FLUKA, and GEANT4 Monte Carlo codes.
Safigholi H; Song WY
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(15):155010. PubMed ID: 29968580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fast calculation of nanodosimetric quantities in treatment planning of proton and ion therapy.
Ramos-Méndez J; Burigo LN; Schulte R; Chuang C; Faddegon B
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235015. PubMed ID: 30484432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning.
Barragán Montero AM; Souris K; Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):846-862. PubMed ID: 29159915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benchmarking analytical calculations of proton doses in heterogeneous matter.
Ciangaru G; Polf JC; Bues M; Smith AR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3511-23. PubMed ID: 16475750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using PENH.
Gomà C; Sterpin E
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 64(18):185009. PubMed ID: 31416054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Hounsfield number conversion on CT based proton Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Jiang H; Seco J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1439-49. PubMed ID: 17500475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
