BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26611766)

  • 1. Network regularised Cox regression and multiplex network models to predict disease comorbidities and survival of cancer.
    Xu H; Moni MA; Liò P
    Comput Biol Chem; 2015 Dec; 59 Pt B():15-31. PubMed ID: 26611766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the utility of clinical outcome-guided mutual information network in network-based Cox regression.
    Jeong HH; Kim S; Wee K; Sohn KA
    BMC Syst Biol; 2015; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 25708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CASPAR: a hierarchical bayesian approach to predict survival times in cancer from gene expression data.
    Kaderali L; Zander T; Faigle U; Wolf J; Schultze JL; Schrader R
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1495-502. PubMed ID: 16554338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cancer survival analysis using semi-supervised learning method based on Cox and AFT models with L1/2 regularization.
    Liang Y; Chai H; Liu XY; Xu ZB; Zhang H; Leung KS
    BMC Med Genomics; 2016 Mar; 9():11. PubMed ID: 26932592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DegreeCox - a network-based regularization method for survival analysis.
    Veríssimo A; Oliveira AL; Sagot MF; Vinga S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 16):449. PubMed ID: 28105908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
    Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Network-based survival analysis reveals subnetwork signatures for predicting outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment.
    Zhang W; Ota T; Shridhar V; Chien J; Wu B; Kuang R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(3):e1002975. PubMed ID: 23555212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partial Cox regression analysis for high-dimensional microarray gene expression data.
    Li H; Gui J
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i208-15. PubMed ID: 15262801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
    Gui J; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kernel Cox regression models for linking gene expression profiles to censored survival data.
    Li H; Luan Y
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2003; ():65-76. PubMed ID: 12603018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrative analysis of survival-associated gene sets in breast cancer.
    Varn FS; Ung MH; Lou SK; Cheng C
    BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Mar; 8():11. PubMed ID: 25881247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive genomics: a cancer hallmark network framework for predicting tumor clinical phenotypes using genome sequencing data.
    Wang E; Zaman N; Mcgee S; Milanese JS; Masoudi-Nejad A; O'Connor-McCourt M
    Semin Cancer Biol; 2015 Feb; 30():4-12. PubMed ID: 24747696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of pathway structure information into a reweighted partial Cox regression approach for survival analysis on high-dimensional gene expression data.
    Liu W; Wang Q; Zhao J; Zhang C; Liu Y; Zhang J; Bai X; Li X; Feng H; Liao M; Wang W; Li C
    Mol Biosyst; 2015 Jul; 11(7):1876-86. PubMed ID: 25891149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partial least squares proportional hazard regression for application to DNA microarray survival data.
    Nguyen DV; Rocke DM
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Dec; 18(12):1625-32. PubMed ID: 12490447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cox survival analysis of microarray gene expression data using correlation principal component regression.
    Zhao Q; Sun J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article16. PubMed ID: 17542778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel network control model for identifying personalized driver genes in cancer.
    Guo WF; Zhang SW; Zeng T; Li Y; Gao J; Chen L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1007520. PubMed ID: 31765387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data-driven approach to predict survival of cancer patients: estimation of microarray genes' prediction significance by Cox proportional hazard regression model.
    Motakis E; Ivshina AV; Kuznetsov VA
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2009; 28(4):58-66. PubMed ID: 19622426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer survival classification using integrated data sets and intermediate information.
    Kim S; Park T; Kon M
    Artif Intell Med; 2014 Sep; 62(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 24997860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gsslasso Cox: a Bayesian hierarchical model for predicting survival and detecting associated genes by incorporating pathway information.
    Tang Z; Lei S; Zhang X; Yi Z; Guo B; Chen JY; Shen Y; Yi N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 20(1):94. PubMed ID: 30813883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.