216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26612698)
1. Impact of prostate catheter displacement in inverse planning--simulated annealing and geometric optimization.
Reynés-Llompart G; Pino F; Modolell I; Gullón C; Pera J; Gutierrez C; Picón C
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 26612698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate.
Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel urethral sparing technique for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Kunogi H; Cunha JAM; Chang AJ; Gadzinski AJ; Shinohara K; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(6):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 28869143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter on dosimetry with IPSA optimisation for HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Smith RL; Panettieri V; Lancaster C; Mason N; Franich RD; Millar JL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 38(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 25481387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomy-based inverse planning simulated annealing optimization in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: significant dosimetric advantage over other optimization techniques.
Jacob D; Raben A; Sarkar A; Grimm J; Simpson L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(3):820-7. PubMed ID: 18455325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric impact of dwell time deviation constraint on inverse brachytherapy treatment planning and comparison with conventional optimization method for interstitial brachytherapy implants.
Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(2):463-470. PubMed ID: 34121693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose optimization comparison study of inverse planning simulated annealing [IPSA] and hybrid inverse planning optimization [HIPO] in interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer.
Kumar Barik B; Sarang Dhar S; Singh R; Mandal A; Mohan Aggarwal L; Pratap Shahi U; Choudhary S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):417-421. PubMed ID: 34088645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of optimization methods for multichannel intracavitary brachytherapy for superficial vaginal tumors.
Lapuz C; Dempsey C; Capp A; O'Brien PC
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(6):637-44. PubMed ID: 23850274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of graphical optimization and inverse planning simulated annealing for brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Tang B; Liu X; Wang X; Kang S; Wang P; Li J; Orlandini LC
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2019 Aug; 11(4):379-383. PubMed ID: 31523240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of catheter displacement and anatomical variations on the dose distribution in MRI-guided focal HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
Maenhout M; van der Voort van Zyp JRN; Borot de Battisti M; Peters M; van Vulpen M; van den Bosch M; Moerland MA
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 28579419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy consistently results in high quality dosimetry.
White EC; Kamrava MR; Demarco J; Park SJ; Wang PC; Kayode O; Steinberg ML; Demanes DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 22652111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection.
Frank CH; Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Ruan D; Park SJ; Chang AJ; Venkat PS; Kishan AU; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6525-6534. PubMed ID: 37650773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
