These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26612703)

  • 1. Randomized trial of the chest compressions effectiveness comparing 3 feedback CPR devices and standard basic life support by nurses.
    Truszewski Z; Szarpak L; Kurowski A; Evrin T; Zasko P; Bogdanski L; Czyzewski L
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 34(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 26612703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study.
    Zapletal B; Greif R; Stumpf D; Nierscher FJ; Frantal S; Haugk M; Ruetzler K; Schlimp C; Fischer H
    Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 24215730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual chest compressions and the use of TrueCPR and PocketCPR feedback devices.
    Kurowski A; Szarpak Ł; Bogdański Ł; Zaśko P; Czyżewski Ł
    Kardiol Pol; 2015; 73(10):924-30. PubMed ID: 25985725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurate feedback of chest compression depth on a manikin on a soft surface with correction for total body displacement.
    Beesems SG; Koster RW
    Resuscitation; 2014 Nov; 85(11):1439-43. PubMed ID: 25150184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study.
    Putzer G; Fiala A; Braun P; Neururer S; Biechl K; Keilig B; Ploner W; Fop E; Paal P
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 50(4):594-600.e1. PubMed ID: 26607696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short structured feedback training is equivalent to a mechanical feedback device in two-rescuer BLS: a randomised simulation study.
    Pavo N; Goliasch G; Nierscher FJ; Stumpf D; Haugk M; Breckwoldt J; Ruetzler K; Greif R; Fischer H
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 May; 24():70. PubMed ID: 27177424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects and limitations of an AED with audiovisual feedback for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized manikin study.
    Fischer H; Gruber J; Neuhold S; Frantal S; Hochbrugger E; Herkner H; Schöchl H; Steinlechner B; Greif R
    Resuscitation; 2011 Jul; 82(7):902-7. PubMed ID: 21454006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulation intervention with manikin-based objective metrics improves CPR instructor chest compression performance skills without improvement in chest compression assessment skills.
    Al-Rasheed RS; Devine J; Dunbar-Viveiros JA; Jones MS; Dannecker M; Machan JT; Jay GD; Kobayashi L
    Simul Healthc; 2013 Aug; 8(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 23842118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-time visual feedback during training improves laypersons' CPR quality: a randomized controlled manikin study.
    Baldi E; Cornara S; Contri E; Epis F; Fina D; Zelaschi B; Dossena C; Fichtner F; Tonani M; Di Maggio M; Zambaiti E; Somaschini A
    CJEM; 2017 Nov; 19(6):480-487. PubMed ID: 28115027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-time feedback improves chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective cohort study.
    Lakomek F; Lukas RP; Brinkrolf P; Mennewisch A; Steinsiek N; Gutendorf P; Sudowe H; Heller M; Kwiecien R; Zarbock A; Bohn A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229431. PubMed ID: 32092113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after introduction of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS-2; a prospective, observational study.
    Tranberg T; Lassen JF; Kaltoft AK; Hansen TM; Stengaard C; Knudsen L; Trautner S; Terkelsen CJ
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Apr; 23():37. PubMed ID: 25898992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
    Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
    Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.
    Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Cho SJ
    Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23402967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compressing with dominant hand improves quality of manual chest compressions for rescuers who performed suboptimal CPR in manikins.
    Wang J; Tang C; Zhang L; Gong Y; Yin C; Li Y
    Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Jul; 33(7):931-6. PubMed ID: 25937378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of closed chest compression on a manikin in ambulance vehicles and flying helicopters with a real time automated feedback.
    Havel C; Schreiber W; Trimmel H; Malzer R; Haugk M; Richling N; Riedmüller E; Sterz F; Herkner H
    Resuscitation; 2010 Jan; 81(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 19926386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Verbal Motivation vs. Digital Real-Time Feedback during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Comparing Bystander CPR Quality in a Randomized and Controlled Manikin Study of Simulated Cardiac Arrest.
    Plata C; Nowack M; Loeser J; Drinhaus H; Steinhauser S; Hinkelbein J; Wetsch WA; Böttiger BW; Spelten O
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2021; 25(3):377-387. PubMed ID: 32301644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by trained laypersons and an assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
    Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
    Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 17070644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised control trial of prompt and feedback devices and their impact on quality of chest compressions--a simulation study.
    Yeung J; Davies R; Gao F; Perkins GD
    Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):553-9. PubMed ID: 24463223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Chest Compressions Metrics Measured Using the Laerdal Skill Reporter and Q-CPR: A Simulation Study.
    Davey P; Whatman C; Dicker B
    Simul Healthc; 2015 Oct; 10(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 26426556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.