1249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26613280)
1. Correlation of quality of life and functional outcome measures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Lubelski D; Alvin MD; Nesterenko S; Sundar SJ; Thompson NR; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 26613280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional outcome instruments used for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: interscale correlation and prediction of preference-based quality of life.
Whitmore RG; Ghogawala Z; Petrov D; Schwartz JS; Stein SC
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):902-7. PubMed ID: 23523443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of life outcomes following cervical decompression for coexisting Parkinson's disease and cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Xiao R; Miller JA; Lubelski D; Alberts JL; Mroz TE; Benzel EC; Krishnaney AA; Machado AG
Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 27496286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of dynamic alignment, motion, and center of rotation on myelopathy grade and regional disability in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Liu S; Lafage R; Smith JS; Protopsaltis TS; Lafage VC; Challier V; Shaffrey CI; Radcliff K; Arnold PM; Chapman JR; Schwab FJ; Massicotte EM; Yoon ST; Fehlings MG; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 26315953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ancillary outcome measures for assessment of individuals with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Kalsi-Ryan S; Singh A; Massicotte EM; Arnold PM; Brodke DS; Norvell DC; Hermsmeyer JT; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S111-22. PubMed ID: 23963009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychometric properties of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Kopjar B; Tetreault L; Kalsi-Ryan S; Fehlings M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E23-8. PubMed ID: 25341993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in neurological function and quality of life after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: a prospective cohort study.
Zhou F; Zhang Y; Sun Y; Zhang F; Pan S; Liu Z
Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2918-23. PubMed ID: 26324283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging is associated with baseline neurological status and can predict postoperative recovery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Arvin B; Kalsi-Ryan S; Mercier D; Furlan JC; Massicotte EM; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):1170-6. PubMed ID: 23462574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myelopathic signs and functional outcome following cervical decompression surgery: a proposed myelopathy scale.
El-Zuway S; Farrokhyar F; Kachur E
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 26849710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Karpova A; Arun R; Davis AM; Kulkarni AV; Massicotte EM; Mikulis DJ; Lubina ZI; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 23448898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters correlate with the clinical presentation and functional outcomes after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A prospective multicenter study.
Karpova A; Arun R; Kalsi-Ryan S; Massicotte EM; Kopjar B; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(18):1488-97. PubMed ID: 24859570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What predicts the best 24-month outcomes following surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A QOD prospective registry study.
Chan AK; Park C; Shaffrey CI; Gottfried ON; Than KD; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Asher AL; Coric D; Potts EA; Foley KT; Wang MY; Fu KM; Virk MS; Knightly JJ; Meyer S; Park P; Upadhyaya CD; Shaffrey ME; Buchholz AL; Tumialán LM; Turner JD; Michalopoulos G; Sherrod BA; Agarwal N; Chou D; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Apr; 40(4):453-464. PubMed ID: 38181405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Clinical Prediction Rule for Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of an International Prospective Multicenter Data Set of 757 Subjects.
Tetreault L; Kopjar B; Côté P; Arnold P; Fehlings MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Dec; 97(24):2038-46. PubMed ID: 26677238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients.
Fehlings MG; Barry S; Kopjar B; Yoon ST; Arnold P; Massicotte EM; Vaccaro A; Brodke DS; Shaffrey C; Smith JS; Woodard E; Banco RJ; Chapman J; Janssen M; Bono C; Sasso R; Dekutoski M; Gokaslan ZL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2247-52. PubMed ID: 24108289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of life assessment after central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparative evaluation of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref.
Thakar S; Christopher S; Rajshekhar V
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Oct; 11(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 19929335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and modified JOA (mJOA) score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy: a multicenter observational study.
Kato S; Oshima Y; Oka H; Chikuda H; Takeshita Y; Miyoshi K; Kawamura N; Masuda K; Kunogi J; Okazaki R; Azuma S; Hara N; Tanaka S; Takeshita K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123022. PubMed ID: 25837285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of five scoring systems for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy.
Dalitz K; Vitzthum HE
Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):e41-e46. PubMed ID: 18774750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Revanappa KK; Rajshekhar V
Eur Spine J; 2011 Sep; 20(9):1545-51. PubMed ID: 21424591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mild diabetes is not a contraindication for surgical decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America multicenter prospective study (CSM).
Arnold PM; Fehlings MG; Kopjar B; Yoon ST; Massicotte EM; Vaccaro AR; Brodke DS; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS; Woodard EJ; Banco RJ; Chapman JR; Janssen ME; Bono CM; Sasso RC; Dekutoski MB; Gokaslan ZL
Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 23981820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
