These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26613526)

  • 21. Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs.
    Ward JL; Buerkle NP; Bee MA
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():63-75. PubMed ID: 24055623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A temporal hierarchy for conspecific vocalization discrimination in humans.
    De Lucia M; Clarke S; Murray MM
    J Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 30(33):11210-21. PubMed ID: 20720129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception.
    Hoke KL; Burmeister SS; Fernald RD; Rand AS; Ryan MJ; Wilczynski W
    J Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 24(50):11264-72. PubMed ID: 15601932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae)].
    Wei L; Shao WW; Lin ZH
    Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2013 Feb; 34(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 23389973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vocal communication in frogs.
    Kelley DB
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2004 Dec; 14(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 15582379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Testosterone levels and evoked vocal responses in a natural population of the frog Batrachyla taeniata.
    Solís R; Penna M
    Horm Behav; 1997 Apr; 31(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 9154430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Ryan MJ; Rand AS; Marler CA
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2010 Jan; 165(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 19576218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ample active acoustic space of a frog from the South American temperate forest.
    Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Mar; 200(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 24356786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Listen up! Processing of intensity change differs for vocal and nonvocal sounds.
    Schirmer A; Simpson E; Escoffier N
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1176():103-12. PubMed ID: 17900543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.
    Akre KL; Bernal X; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140986. PubMed ID: 24990679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. From bird to sparrow: Learning-induced modulations in fine-grained semantic discrimination.
    De Meo R; Bourquin NM; Knebel JF; Murray MM; Clarke S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():163-73. PubMed ID: 26070264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neglecting the call of the wild: Captive frogs like the sound of their own voice.
    Passos LF; Garcia G; Young RJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181931. PubMed ID: 28732034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand W; Hurd PL; Phelps SM; Rand AS
    Am Nat; 2003 Mar; 161(3):380-94. PubMed ID: 12699219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs.
    Farris HE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Dec; 191(12):1173-83. PubMed ID: 16088388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural responses elicited to face motion and vocalization pairings.
    Puce A; Epling JA; Thompson JC; Carrick OK
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 16766000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prior experience with conspecific signals enhances auditory midbrain responsiveness to conspecific vocalizations.
    Gall MD; Wilczynski W
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Jun; 217(Pt 11):1977-82. PubMed ID: 24871923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sound-induced brain activity depends on stimulus subjective salience in female zebra finches.
    Vignal C; Bouchut C; Mathevon N
    C R Biol; 2008 May; 331(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 18472080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural mechanisms underlying acoustic behaviour of the frog Pseudophryne semimarmorata (Anura: Leptodactylidae).
    Loftus-Hills JJ
    Anim Behav; 1973 Nov; 21(4):781-7. PubMed ID: 4777204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.