These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26613753)

  • 1. Evaluation of the effects of subject thickness on the exposure index in digital radiography.
    Takaki T; Takeda K; Murakami S; Ogawa H; Ogawa M; Sakamoto M
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 26613753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
    Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of calibration error for applying exposure index].
    Ariga E
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1433-7. PubMed ID: 22104235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FEASIBILITY OF DISPLAYED EXPOSURE INDEX IN IEC STANDARD FRAMEWORK AS A DOSE OPTIMISATION TOOL FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Tanaka N; Kim J; Kim J; Morishita J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 32364600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.
    Scott AW; Zhou Y; Allahverdian J; Nute JL; Lee C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):343-355. PubMed ID: 27929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.
    Yoon Y; Park H; Kim J; Kim J; Roh Y; Tanaka N; Morishita J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A radiation exposure index for CT.
    Huda W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 23690648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method to derive appropriate exposure parameters from target exposure index and patient thickness in pediatric digital radiography.
    Zhang M; Liu K; Niu X; Liu X
    Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Mar; 43(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 23208532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between detector size and the need for extra images and their effect on radiation exposure in digital mammography screening.
    Entz K; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2014 Sep; 186(9):868-75. PubMed ID: 24563411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity and reliability of the exposure index as a metric for estimating the radiation dose to the patient.
    Erenstein HG; Browne D; Curtin S; Dwyer RS; Higgins RN; Hommel SF; Menzinga J; Pires Jorge JA; Sauty M; de Vries G; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S94-S99. PubMed ID: 32291123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring clinical exposure index and deviation index for dose optimization based on national diagnostic reference level: Focusing on general radiography of extremities.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Kim E; Jeong H; Kim J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 35124635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The New Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography.
    Seeram E
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 45(2):144-158. PubMed ID: 31051946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of interest region and interest value settings on exposure index-analysis using chest clinical images].
    Nakamae M; Miyajima Y; Nakano T; Kitanaka Y; Okura Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 70(11):1250-7. PubMed ID: 25410331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
    Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography.
    Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 66(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30834686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient dose in digital mammography.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Portable abdomen radiography: moving to thickness-based protocols.
    Sánchez AA; Reiser I; Baxter T; Zhang Y; Finkle JH; Lu ZF; Feinstein KA
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Feb; 48(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 29130139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.