These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26614048)

  • 1. Speech recognition in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.
    de Andrade AN; Iorio MC; Gil D
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 26614048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception in noise in unilateral hearing loss.
    Mondelli MF; Dos Santos Mde M; José MR
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 26699444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Free Field Word recognition test in the presence of noise in normal hearing adults.
    Almeida GVM; Ribas A; Calleros J
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2017; 83(6):665-669. PubMed ID: 27765530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: results in children and adolescents.
    Almeida GFL; Martins MF; Costa LBAD; Costa OAD; Martinho de Carvalho AC
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 30166120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing in Noise Test Brazil: standardization for young adults with normal hearing.
    Sbompato AF; Corteletti LC; Moret Ade L; Jacob RT
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 26130593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open fitting: performance verification of receiver in the ear and receiver in the aid.
    Mondelli MF; Garcia TM; Hashimoto FM; Rocha AV
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 25382428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Irish SE
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):933-41. PubMed ID: 26252182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Difference in Speech Recognition between a Default and Programmed Telecoil Program.
    Ledda KT; Valente M; Oeding K; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 30461405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the speech perception in noise (SPIN) test.
    Hutcherson RW; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1979; 87(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 503495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are two ears not better than one?
    McArdle RA; Killion M; Mennite MA; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 22436115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of automatic signal-processing amplification on speech recognition in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Dempsey JJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1987; 96(3 Pt 1):251-3. PubMed ID: 3605946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Audibility and Suprathreshold Deficits on Speech Recognition for Listeners With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Bost TJM; Versfeld NJ; Goverts ST
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 31242137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.